Expectation value of following function

Kruger
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
I need to find the momentum expectation value of the function in the attached picture. It is the function of the harmonic oscillator (first excited state). :confused:

I know that the expectation value is the value that we measure with the highest probability if we measure the system. But what the hell does the standard deviation d(p)=<p^2>-<p>^2 mean for the harmonic oscillator? Does it mean that if we make 1000 times the same experiment and measure with every experiment the momentum that we result in this d(p) if we always measure p?

And another question is can we measure in one experiment <p> and <x> (the two expectation values) exactly at the same time? I think no, because the uncertainty principle would not be sadisfied.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There's an error there:

\langle\hat{p}_{x}\rangle_{\psi (x)}=-i\hbar\int_{\mathbb{R}} \psi^{*}(x) \frac{d\psi (x)}{dx} \ dx

Daniel.
 
Hello Kruger,

standard deviation is the spread around your mean value. Say you measure your momentum 1000 times.

From the data you collected you can calculate the mean value <p>. In addition, you can also calculate the standard deviation often denoted as \sigma.

What does &lt;p&gt; \pm \sigma mean?
In case of a normal distribution 68% of your data, that is 680 data points will lie within &lt;p&gt; \pm \sigma.

Or to give you a better feeling, say you have a friend who asks you about your measurements. He wants to know, what momentum he will measure if he conducted the same experiment. Then you can tell him: Well, the mean value is <p>, but you will measure with 68% probability a value within &lt;p&gt; \pm \sigma.

The standard deviation moreover tells you how "spread" your values will be around your mean value, the greater \sigma the greater your spread.


By typing "Standard deviation" into google, I found the following websites:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation
http://www.robertniles.com/stats/stdev.shtml
 
Last edited:
Kruger said:
But what the hell does the standard deviation d(p)=<p^2>-<p>^2 mean for the harmonic oscillator?

Correction: you need to take the square root:

\Delta p = \sqrt {&lt;p^2&gt; - &lt;p&gt;^2}

Does it mean that if we make 1000 times the same experiment and measure with every experiment the momentum that we result in this d(p) if we always measure p?

That is approximately correct. Think of the \Delta p that you can calculate from the wave function as an "ideal" or "exact" value. The \Delta p that you calculate from actual experimental measurements is an approximation, which improves as the number of data points increases.

And another question is can we measure in one experiment <p> and <x> (the two expectation values) exactly at the same time?

In one experiment (trial), you cannot meaningfully measure the expectation value of either x or p because you have only one data point to work with.

If you repeat the experiment many many times (identically prepared each time, or course), then measure both x and p each time, you can then estimate &lt;x&gt; and &lt;p&gt; from your data, also &lt;x^2&gt; and &lt;p^2&gt;. Now you can calculate \Delta p as described above, and \Delta x similarly. You will find that those two quantities always satisfy Heisenberg's uncertainty relation, in the limit of an infinite number of trials. If your measured values of p lie within a small range, then the values of x will spread out over a large range, and vice versa. (For some suitable definition of "small" and "large", of course.) That's the meaning of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

Note that the HUP is a statement about the probability distributions that underlie the measured values of x and p. In a finite number of trials, you can test the HUP only approximately, and there is a chance that your particular data may actually appear to violate the HUP! As the number of trials becomes larger this becomes less likely to happen.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top