Expected values of random variables

sid9221
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
I don't completely understand why the area of the proof circled in red is true.

Any advice would be appreciated.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/33103477/Q1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
X1 is a random variable whose mean is \mu by definition. Can you elaborate on your confusion?
 
Office_Shredder said:
X1 is a random variable whose mean is \mu by definition. Can you elaborate on your confusion?

Where is this defined ? Is is part of the definition of 'Expectation' ?
 
Why don't you tell us what you think X1 is, and what \mu is, and we can work from there.
 
Office_Shredder said:
Why don't you tell us what you think X1 is, and what \mu is, and we can work from there.

μ=\frac{\sum X_i}{N}

x_1 is just a variable
 
sid9221 said:
μ=\frac{\sum X_i}{N}

No, the thing on the right hand side is \overline{X}, not \mu. To give an example, suppose I flip ten coins, and assign a value of 1 to a heads, and 0 to a tails. I might get the following:

1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0.

\mu in this context is the expected value of a single flip of the coin, which is .5. \overline{X} is the average of the flips I actually made, which is .4. X1 is the value of the first flip, which in this case happens to be 1, but hopefully it's clear that E(X1) = .5 before I actually flip the coin since X1 is just an arbitrary flip of the coin.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top