Experienced with PQ Control and PI Tuning for Inverter Power Control?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling active/reactive power management in inverters, specifically implementing PQ control with voltage references. Participants share challenges with PI tuning, noting that the grid's behavior significantly influences P and Q outputs. There is an emphasis on determining the zero-degree reference angle in phase with grid voltage and the importance of actual system frequency. Suggestions include using conventional power plant control methods to improve inverter performance and experimenting with control loops based on Id and Iq. The project centers on distributed energy resources (DER), highlighting the need for effective power control strategies.
GregoryGr
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Does anyone have experience modeling active/reactive management in an inverter? I'm working on it for a project, more precisely I'm trying to implement that PQ control with references of voltage, as is seen in this image:

upload_2018-4-2_1-14-36.png


Problem is I've tried many PI regulators, and my I_dq doesn't want to follow the references. Does anybody have experience either on PQ control or in PI tuning (I suppose there is software that can find the optimal PI values? )
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-4-2_1-14-36.png
    upload_2018-4-2_1-14-36.png
    16.8 KB · Views: 735
Engineering news on Phys.org
How have you modeled the grid? The P and Q output is not determined entirely by the inverter, The grid's behavior plays a major role or even the dominant role.

How do you determine the zero degree reference angle in phase with Ed?

Where does actual system frequency come into play?

GregoryGr said:
I_dq
What is that?
 
anorlunda said:
How have you modeled the grid? The P and Q output is not determined entirely by the inverter, The grid's behavior plays a major role or even the dominant role.

How do you determine the zero degree reference angle in phase with Ed?

Where does actual system frequency come into play?What is that?

Hm, I haven't really modeled the grid, it's a fixated 3ph sine source with 400 polar voltage/50Hz and an inductance. What did you have in mind for the grid?

The approach was to orient the grid voltage so Vq = 0 as to use Iq and Id for decoupled power control (sensors are placed in the PCC). So in the image i posted in the modulator, the way i try to simulate it, is first to normalize Ed and Eq reference, and then dq->abc with the same angle the field orientation of the grid, which should in theory provide the necessary phase difference and amplitude to achieve PQ control...
(by Idq I meant both Id & Iq)

Thanks for the quick reply :)
 
GregoryGr said:
Hm, I haven't really modeled the grid, it's a fixated 3ph sine source with 400 polar voltage/50Hz and an inductance. What did you have in mind for the grid?

See this PF Insights article, especially the equations that describe P and Q flow between two adjacent nodes in a grid.
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/ac-power-analysis-part-2-network-analysis/

I think your inverter would work better by imitating conventional power plant controls. One loop to control real power by adjusting phase angle. Another loop to control voltage magnitude and therefore Q.

Control loops feeding back Id and Iq rather than V and ##\theta## sound strange to an old-timer like me.
 
Thank you, I will check this out. What you are suggesting I am currently experimenting with (and even though I haven't managed to work it out, it seems to be responding in the right direction! ). Truth be told, current control without classic hysterysis or bandwidth control seems strange to me too, but it seems to have worked in some papers... The reason I'm attempting that is because in general field control should have a better response.

The topic of my project is about DER sources, so convetional power controls should be on point!
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top