Experiment: Pendulum with Spring - Simulate Oscillation Trajectory

AI Thread Summary
A pendulum with a spring instead of a string exhibits unique oscillation behavior due to the spring's changing length during motion. The potential energy of the system combines both the spring's elasticity and gravitational forces, leading to a complex equation governing motion. The kinetic energy is also influenced by the radial and angular velocities of the pendulum. Simulating this system on a computer could reveal the trajectory and stability of oscillations, although the equations involved are intricate. Understanding these dynamics could provide insights into the differences between traditional and spring-based pendulum systems.
qartveli
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody :) I need some help in an experiment simulation :) If you will make a pendulum with a spring instead of a string or rope (nonelastic), then bend it over on θ angle and then let it go - it will start to oscillate around with different manner than a simple pendulum :) with centripetal force spring will get longer and longer, after T/4 spring will start to get shorter and etc... This difference in length will change the period of oscillation of a pendulum and the trajectory too. So can anybody make simulate this experiment in the computer and post the picture of trajectory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting question. If we had just a 1d spring, the potential energy would be given by: V = \frac{1}{2} k Q^2 (Where Q is the displacement from equilibrium). And for a 2d pendulum, the potential energy is: V = -mgrcos(\theta). Now if we define the displacement from equilibrium to be r-l (in other words, the change in length of the pendulum, where l is simply a constant), and if we add the two potentials together, we would get a total potential:
V = \frac{1}{2}k(r-l)^2 - mgrcos(\theta)
Now I'm going to talk about the 2d case, because the equations are easier. So the kinetic energy of the object is given by:
KE = \frac{1}{2}m(\dot{r}^2 + r \dot{\theta}^2 )
And now, we can use the Euler-Lagrange equations to find out the laws of the system:
-grsin(\theta) = \frac{d(r \dot{\theta})}{dt}
mr \dot{\theta} - k(r-l) + mgcos(\theta) = m \ddot{r}
And there is also the equation for the conservation of energy, which simply says that the kinetic energy plus the potential energy is conserved.

So, the equations are a bit complicated. We could also make the small angle approximation, which would make sin(\theta) \rightarrow \theta and cos(\theta) \rightarrow 1 - \frac{1}{2} \theta^2 But it would still look quite complicated.

You could use these equations for a simulation on computer, and that would show the kind of trajectory to expect. And maybe there is a way to do stability analysis, which would show that certain trajectories are more stable than others, I'm not sure..
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top