Programs Experimental data in theoretical PhD?

AI Thread Summary
PhD students in theoretical cosmology, gravitation, and black holes primarily focus on physical theory, making predictions, and solving theoretical problems, often with limited engagement in experimental data analysis. The extent of raw data analysis varies by research group, with some students analyzing raw images and spectra while others rely on published values or results from collaborators. Understanding raw data is crucial for assessing the reliability of experimental conclusions. Engaging in redshift data analysis for an undergraduate research project is beneficial, as it provides valuable experience and prepares students for future PhD studies, emphasizing the importance of experimental data in developing robust theories in physics.
muppet
Messages
602
Reaction score
1
Hi all,
I was wondering if PhD students in theoretical aspects of cosmology,gravitation, black holes... etc do any/much analysis of experimental data, and just mainly omit observational technique, or if their entire education is in learning physical theory and making predictions and solving problems using it.
The reason I ask is that I'm applying for an undergraduate research bursary for a project that will involve analysing redshift data to make deductions about the large-scale structure of the universe, and I need to know if I'm getting valuable preparation for my intended PhD in a few years, or if I'm rounding out my skill base :biggrin:
Many thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without the experimental data how do you create the theory?
How much you actually analyse raw images/spectra etc compared to using published values or results of collaborators varies with the group.
But without any experimental data it's not physics it's either maths or philosophy.

ps. It's always useful to know about the raw data - so you know how far the experimentalists conclusions can be trusted.
 
The degree of raw data analysis was the point I was looking to address, thanks.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top