Experimental evidence of Gauss's law in electrodynamics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the experimental validation of Gauss's law in electrodynamics, particularly in non-static scenarios where Coulomb's law is no longer applicable. Participants assert that while Gauss's law can be derived from Coulomb's law in electrostatics, experimental evidence is necessary to support Gauss's law in dynamic conditions. The conversation highlights the significance of testing Gauss's law as a means to validate the exponent 2 in Coulomb's law and references ongoing experiments that explore the mass of the photon, which is crucial for understanding the validity of the 1/r² relationship.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's law in electrodynamics
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's law and its limitations
  • Knowledge of experimental physics related to electromagnetic waves
  • Basic concepts of reference frames in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research recent experimental tests of Gauss's law in non-static conditions
  • Explore the implications of photon mass on electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate the role of reference frames in electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Review literature on the divergence of electric fields in various contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism who seek to deepen their understanding of the experimental foundations of Gauss's law and its applications in dynamic systems.

kof9595995
Messages
676
Reaction score
2
In electrostatic case, Gauss's law can be derived from Columb's law, so we can regard experimental evidence for Columb's law as evidence of Gauss's law. But what about non-static case? In this case we know columb's law is no longer valid, so we need experimental evidence to justify Gauss's law, am I correct? If so, could you guys show me some of such experiments?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, the experimental evidence is stronger for Gauss than for Coulomb.
Since both depend on the exponent 2 in Coulomb's law, testing Gauss is used as a test for that exponent. Today, most tests are interpreted as a limit on the mass of the photon, since zero mass leads to the 1/r^2. you could go to <http://pdg.lbl.gov/> and go to the photon to see recent experimental tests.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Emm, true.
Actually yesterday an Italian guy came to our school and gave a seminar, discussed what can we get for EM wave if divE=0 is not necessarily true in pure void (He's a mathematician not physicist). I just didn't get the point, because i think divE=0 is well examined by experiments, and he mentioned it might not be true because we couldn't choose a reference frame relatively at rest to the EM wave(i might not hear him very clearly, but definitely something involving reference frame), but I couldn't see the logic...Do you guys understand?
Anyway that reminds me to check if there's any experiment done in a non-lab frame (relatively moving w.r.t earth)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K