Will there ever be any form of experimental proof of multiple dimensions, even any thought experiment which would be able to proof or disprove the existence of one?
There are experiments that have been going on since 2000 to check that some of the compact dimensions of superstring theory may have dimensions as large as a micrometer. This would show up as a modification to the behavior of gravity at very short distances. They haven't found any such thing yet, but they haven't given up looking either.
#3
R0man
509
0
The concept of hyperspace and multiple dimensions is a topic that has fascinated scientists and philosophers for centuries. While there is currently no experimental proof of hyperspace, there have been several theories and thought experiments proposed that attempt to explain its existence.
One such thought experiment is the "Flatland" analogy, which imagines a two-dimensional world inhabited by flat beings. These beings would have no concept of the third dimension until they were introduced to it by a higher-dimensional being, just as we have trouble visualizing or understanding a fourth dimension.
Another approach is through mathematical equations and theories, such as string theory and M-theory, which propose the existence of multiple dimensions beyond the three that we can perceive.
However, it is important to note that these theories and thought experiments are still just theoretical and have not been experimentally proven. It is possible that with advancements in technology and our understanding of the universe, we may one day be able to gather experimental evidence for the existence of hyperspace and multiple dimensions.
Until then, the concept of hyperspace and multiple dimensions remains a fascinating and thought-provoking topic that continues to spark curiosity and imagination.
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this:
Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.)
Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion
Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit?
Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it.
If not please ignore me.
EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia).
My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...