- #1
- 24,775
- 792
Can we learn anything about the status of QG phenomenology by checking out the abstracts for the July talks?
Bee Hossenfelder, who occasionally posts here, has organized a conference, set for 12-16 July, on Experimental Search for Quantum Gravity.
Just as a side comment: a lot of conferences they don't even post the list of speakers, or the titles of the talks, a month in advance. In marked contrast, this conference has already had the speakers, the participants, the talks listed for some time, well over a month ahead, and even posted some abstracts. From an amateur observer standpoint like mine, it bespeaks efficient organization. Also the lineup of speakers is ecumenical.
They represent a lot of different approaches to QG (including the stringy spacetime foam of Mavromatos) and a remarkable variety of ideas about ways to test them.
I was mildly surprised not to see the names of Aurelien Barrau, Julien Grain, Jakub Mielczarek, or Seth Major among the participants. But that could be for any number of reasons. Overall the turnout and variety, and so to speak the depth, of the program is impressive. It is far more substantial than one might have expected with such a new field as empirical QG search. Many people still think of "observational QG" as a contradiction in terms.
In any case, I will copy here the list of talks to make it convenient to assess, and we can try to get an idea of how things are shaping up. The abstracts, some quite long and detailed, are here:
http://th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~hossi/ESQG10/abstracts.html
Bee Hossenfelder, who occasionally posts here, has organized a conference, set for 12-16 July, on Experimental Search for Quantum Gravity.
Just as a side comment: a lot of conferences they don't even post the list of speakers, or the titles of the talks, a month in advance. In marked contrast, this conference has already had the speakers, the participants, the talks listed for some time, well over a month ahead, and even posted some abstracts. From an amateur observer standpoint like mine, it bespeaks efficient organization. Also the lineup of speakers is ecumenical.
They represent a lot of different approaches to QG (including the stringy spacetime foam of Mavromatos) and a remarkable variety of ideas about ways to test them.
I was mildly surprised not to see the names of Aurelien Barrau, Julien Grain, Jakub Mielczarek, or Seth Major among the participants. But that could be for any number of reasons. Overall the turnout and variety, and so to speak the depth, of the program is impressive. It is far more substantial than one might have expected with such a new field as empirical QG search. Many people still think of "observational QG" as a contradiction in terms.
In any case, I will copy here the list of talks to make it convenient to assess, and we can try to get an idea of how things are shaping up. The abstracts, some quite long and detailed, are here:
http://th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~hossi/ESQG10/abstracts.html
Last edited: