Explain Algorithmic Cooling: "Redemption Ark" by Alastair Reynolds

donkeyhide
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
can someone explain algorithmic cooling to me? (i think that's what it's called.) in a work of fiction i am presently reading, an interior space is cooled by a quantum-computational device engaged in ongoing calculations. the book is 'redemption ark' by alastair reynolds and the technology is named (in the book) a 'cryo-arithmetic engine.' i believe I've read something before about how heat ties into whether a computational operation is 'reversible' or not. obviously i have no idea what I'm talking about. I've only read a few layman's books on quantum computing. i just want to know how something like this might work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I saw a theory one time, I think it was a farse, in which the process of computer processing is supposed to use up fundamental particles called "computons," or something like this. These are, in turn, supposed to be quanta of "coldness." Since the process of comuptation is fundamentally using up these "coldness particles," that supposedly explains why a computer processor heats up. Maybe that's what you're looking for. Personally, it sounds like a bunch of horse crap to me.
 
no, this is a real phenomenon with quantum computers, apparently. i never read the details, but i have vague impressions of what it might be about for some reason:

in normal computers, heat is generated whenever a bit is flipped. it takes energy to do so. some is lost as heat. such computations are not 'reversible' since to flip the bit back youre going to again have to apply energy. heat is always lost. in quantum computers, i guess any computation is fully reversible. whatever that means. the tiny little thing i read about this months ago is almost completely lost to me now. the only thing that's sticking with me is the term 'reversible computing'

ah, i just found this, check this out:
http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/reversible.html

http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~mpf/rc/home.html


the device in the book works with this idea somehow
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top