Why is the Phase Shift in Grover's Algorithm Applied to All Elements Except 0?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of phase shifts in Grover's algorithm, specifically why the phase shift is applied to all elements except for the state |0⟩. Participants explore the implications of this choice within the context of quantum computing, referencing the oracle's function and the transformations involved in the algorithm.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the rationale behind applying a phase shift to all states except |0⟩, seeking clarification on its effects.
  • Another participant asks for a specific reference in the Nielsen and Chuang book, indicating a potential discrepancy in understanding how oracles function.
  • A participant provides a link to a resource that illustrates the circuit from Nielsen and Chuang, reiterating the question about the phase shift.
  • There is a suggestion that the oracle's operation, which inverts the state sought, is distinct from the phase shift applied to other states.
  • One participant emphasizes that the oracle's behavior is defined by the function f(x), which determines which state is inverted, and notes that the phase shift's application depends on the oracle's implementation.
  • A participant proposes that the matrix representation of the operations could clarify the effects of the phase shift, although they express uncertainty about how to construct this matrix.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the reason for the phase shift's selective application. Multiple viewpoints are presented regarding the role of the oracle and the implications of the phase shift, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions behind the oracle's function and the specific conditions under which the phase shift is applied. The discussion highlights the complexity of the algorithm's operations and the need for clarity in the definitions used.

Peter_Newman
Messages
155
Reaction score
11
Hi everybody,

I've read some pages in Nielsens "Quantum Computing" book, it's very interesting, but especially at Grover's algorithm, there occurs a question for me. It is said that a phase shift is performed, which is defined as follows:

##|0\rangle \rightarrow |0\rangle \\ |x\rangle \rightarrow -|x\rangle \\ \text{for } x>0##

But now I'm wondering why the phase shift is applied to all elements except 0. Why is that, what effect does that have? I have already read something, but so far no one could answer me why you omit the 0.

I would be glad, if someone can tell me why this is how it does it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you talking about the book by Nielsen and Chuang?

In any case, could you indicate precisely where this appears? It doesn't look like what I know about how oracles work.
 
Yes, I am talking about Nielsen and Chuang. I have here a link to a page where the same circuit from Nielsen and Chuang is displayed:
http://www.users.csbsju.edu/~lziegler/CS317I/GroversAlgorithm.html
Why does one apply the phase shift to all states except 0?

So first of all you apply the oracle that exactly tilts the state that is sought.
$$(-1)^{f(x)}|x\rangle$$
Then you applie the Hadamard transformation and the Grover Iterator and finally the Hadamard transformation agian. If I understand it correctly, then you can rewrite the expression as well:
$$H^{n}(2|0\rangle\langle0|-I)H^n=2|\psi\rangle\langle\psi|-I$$

I've seen somewhere that one can express that as a matrix (unfortunately I do not know exactly how to do that). But my guess is that if you do that in the matrix, you can directly see that the effects of this operation are just $$|0\rangle\rightarrow |0\rangle $$ $$|x\rangle \rightarrow -|x\rangle $$But it has to be said that this still does not answer the question why in all states except 0 the phase shift is applied ...
 
Last edited:
Peter_Newman said:
I've seen somewhere that one can express that as a matrix (unfortunately I do not know exactly how to do that). But my guess is that if you do that in the matrix, you can directly see that the effects of this operation are just $$|0\rangle\rightarrow |0\rangle $$ $$|x\rangle \rightarrow -|x\rangle $$But it has to be said that this still does not answer the question why in all states except 0 the phase shift is applied ...

Aren't those two expressions just saying that all states other than the one picked out by the oracle are left alone and the one picked out is inverted?

Cheers
 
Peter_Newman said:
I've seen somewhere that one can express that as a matrix (unfortunately I do not know exactly how to do that). But my guess is that if you do that in the matrix, you can directly see that the effects of this operation are just $$|0\rangle\rightarrow |0\rangle $$ $$|x\rangle \rightarrow -|x\rangle $$
But that's not what the oracle does. As you started yourself, the oracle performs the operation
$$(-1)^{f(x)}|x\rangle$$
Notice the appearance of ##f(x)##, not ##x##. You will get
$$|0\rangle\rightarrow |0\rangle $$ $$|x\rangle \rightarrow -|x\rangle $$
only if ##f(0) = 0##, ##f(x\neq0) = 1##.

How the oracle works depends on the implementation. It simply needs to recognise the desired state, the one for which ##f(x) = 0##. In the ##| x \rangle## basis, this is implemented as the matrix
$$
\begin{pmatrix}
-1 & 0 & \cdots \\
0 & -1 & 0 & \cdots \\
& & \ddots & \\
& & 0 & 1 & 0 & \cdots \\
& & & 0 & -1 & 0 & \cdots \\
& & & & & \ddots \\
\end{pmatrix}
$$
where the ##1## is in the row corresponding to the desired ##|x\rangle##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K