I Explain EM Drive: A Level Essay Help

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Falcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drive Em Explain
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the EM Drive, which is described as using microwaves in a tapered chamber to create thrust by exerting different forces at each end. The concept is likened to the idea of flying by pulling up on shoelaces, indicating confusion about its mechanics. There is significant controversy surrounding the EM Drive, with references to Roger Shawyer's equation involving electric and magnetic fields. However, the thread is ultimately closed for moderation, as the EM Drive is classified as a "forbidden topic" due to its status as a debunked concept in physics. The discussion highlights the challenges in understanding and explaining such controversial theories in the context of space exploration.
Falcus
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am writing an essay for my extended project A Level, and part of this I am writing about the EMDrive. I thought I would be able to skim over how it works mostly earlier but have decided I would rather not. I am struggling to understand how it works and any explanation would be helpful. To my understanding, microwaves are fired into a tapered chamber and when they hit off one end they exert a greater force than on the other creating a resultant thrust. I have seen this compared to flying by pulling up on your shoe laces, which I have to agree is what I picture it as. I have come to understand that there is actually a reasonable amount of controversy surrounding this concept. I also believe magnet and electric fields are involved somewhere? Due to Roger Shawyer using the equation F= q(E+vB) in his original paper.

Thanks in advance
Falcus

P.S - I posed a question for the same essay about physically defining lorentzian wormholes also so if anyone could answer that would be extremely helpful, also if it helps the title of my essay is 'What recognised theories, if physically achieved, could aid future space exploration?' and I understand how the theories aid this, just defining them is my issue due to my limited A level understanding accompanied by a plethora of further reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
This thread will remain closed. The EM Drive is on the list of PF Forbidden Topics (see the Rules link at the top of the page under INFO). It is crackpot stuff, and not worth the time to debunk. From the Forbidden Topics list:
micromass said:
EMDrive and other reactionless drives
Articles suggesting that NASA, the Chinese government, or some other governmental actor is working on such a technology frequently appear in the popular press. These claims have been extensively debunked and are not acceptable references under the Physics Forums rules.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top