Explain Why we get hut by kicking a brick

  • Thread starter Thread starter area51
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain
AI Thread Summary
Kicking a brick results in injury due to the significant force generated by rapid acceleration, as explained by Newton's third law of motion. When gently pushing the brick, only a minimal force is applied, resulting in negligible impact. In contrast, a kick involves a large force due to the quick acceleration, which the brick equally counteracts, leading to pain. Friction does not aid in moving the brick; it actually opposes motion. Understanding these principles clarifies why kicking a brick hurts.
area51
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Explain Why we get hurt by kicking a brick

Homework Statement

You can easily move a brick lying on a floor by gently pushing it by your foot. But
you hurt your foot when you try to kick the brick. Explain why? (in 60 to 80 words)



Homework Equations

Theory Question



The Attempt at a Solution

Explanation: When we gently push the brick with foot, The Force we apply on the brick by pushing and friction by floor makes it move. But when we kick the brick lying on the floor, From Newtons third law of motion: Every action has equal and opposite reaction. the brick applies the same opposite force that we apply on the brick by kicking and we get hurt.

is it right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that's not right. Newton's third law of motion applies in both cases. Even when slowly moving the brick, the brick applies the same force to your foot.

The difference is the amount of the force. If you move a brick slowly, you are applying a very slight acceleration to get it moving, then almost no acceleration so, since F= ma, very slight force, then almost no force. When you kick a brick quickly, you apply a lot of acceleration so a large force- which, by Newton's third law, the brick also applies to your foot.

By the way, "friction on the floor" does NOT make the brick move. It slows the brick- friction always acts against motion. The friction is the reason that, once the brick is moving, you must apply "almost" no force. If there were no friction, once the brick started moving, it would continue to move with no additional force.
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, that's not right. Newton's third law of motion applies in both cases. Even when slowly moving the brick, the brick applies the same force to your foot.

The difference is the amount of the force. If you move a brick slowly, you are applying a very slight acceleration to get it moving, then almost no acceleration so, since F= ma, very slight force, then almost no force. When you kick a brick quickly, you apply a lot of acceleration so a large force- which, by Newton's third law, the brick also applies to your foot.

By the way, "friction on the floor" does NOT make the brick move. It slows the brick- friction always acts against motion. The friction is the reason that, once the brick is moving, you must apply "almost" no force. If there were no friction, once the brick started moving, it would continue to move with no additional force.

so in ur words, can u answer it in 60-80 words the above question
 
so is this answer correct,

Answer: Here Newton's third law of motion applies on both cases. when we push the brick lying on the floor with our foot. The Brick applies the same opposite force to our foot. here the difference is amount of force. when we push the brick we apply less acceleration to move it. its almost no acceleration. But when we kick the brick quickly we apply a lot of acceleration on it so the force increases, by Newton's third law "every action has an equal and opposite reaction", the brick also applies the same force on our foot and we get hurt.

ur post helped me a lot and cleared my confusion in physics, hope u'll help me in future
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top