Explaining Non Archimedean Norm Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter frb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Norm
frb
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
can someone explain this proof please, I added a star to the inequalities I don't see/understand.

if | | is a norm on a field K and if there is a C > 0 so that for all integers n |n.1| is smaller than or equal to C, the norm is non archimedean (ie the strong triangle inequality is true)

proof: if x and y in K

\[<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> |x + y|^n \le \sum\limits_{k = 0}^n {|\frac{{n!}}{{k!(n - k)!}}} x^k y^{n - k} | \le *(n + 1).C.\max \left( {|x|,|y|} \right)^n \\ <br /> |x + y| \le *\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left[ {(n + 1)C.\max \left( {|x|,|y|} \right)^n } \right]^{1/n} * = \max \left( {|x|,|y|} \right) \\ <br /> \end{array}<br /> \]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Does |ab| = |a||b| hold? Then for the first inequality, you can split the summand into the product of three norms. The first norm is that of an integer, hence is no greater than C. Then you have |xk||yn-k| which is no greater than max(|x|,|y|)n. The sum goes from k=0 to n, i.e. it has n+1 terms, accounting for the (n+1) factor on the right side of the inequality. Next, by establishing |x+y|n < X, where X is the rightmost expression on the first line, you get |x+y| < X1/n. n is arbitrary here, so this inequality holds for all n, and hence it holds for the limit as n goes to infinity. For an analogy, observe that 0 < 1/n for all n, hence 0 < \lim _{n\to\infty }1/n. Finally, since [max(|x|,|y|)n]1/n = max(|x|,|y|), you can pull it out of the limit. Then I guess [(n+1)C]1/n goes to 1 as n goes to infinity.
 
I get it, thanks for helping.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top