Explaining Rotational Mechanics: Friction and Stationary Disc

AI Thread Summary
When a disc is placed on a plank and the plank is pulled, friction between the two creates an unbalanced torque, causing the disc to rotate. However, the discussion raises the question of why the disc appears stationary despite this friction, suggesting a misunderstanding of the mechanics involved. Participants express confusion about the assumptions regarding the disc's motion and reference Newton's laws to clarify the situation. Additionally, there is mention of a coaching institute that provides challenging questions related to this topic, indicating a focus on advanced understanding. Overall, the conversation revolves around the complexities of rotational mechanics and the effects of friction on motion.
AdityaDev
Messages
527
Reaction score
33
When you put o disc on top of a plank and if you pull the plank, the disc rotates but stays stationary.
Here the friction between the plank and disk produces an unbalanced torque and hence it spins.But this friction should also cause an acceleration in the disc right? Then why does it remain stationary?
WP_20150213_22_38_24_Pro.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
who gived the assumption that it stay stationary? it does not stay stationary at all i think, just apply Newton's law...i'm curios about answers to this question :)
 
GiuseppeR7 said:
who gived the assumption that it stay stationary? it does not stay stationary at all i think, just apply Newton's law...i'm curios about answers to this question :)
Sorry. It doesn't stay stationary. Actually i was thinking about this question. I did not understand it properly.
I got the first two correct but i am still working on Q3.
WP_20150213_23_09_21_Pro.jpg
 
ah ok :) what book is that by the way? title and author? thanks!
 
GiuseppeR7 said:
ah ok :) what book is that by the way? title and author? thanks!
You can't buy it. You have to join my coaching institute. The questions are set by some reputed teachers and the book gets updated every year. No particular author. It's called Grand Masters Package.the questions are very difficult.
 
ah ok...thank you :)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top