Explaining the Discrepancy of W+2jets Signals at Tevatron

  • Thread starter Thread starter Safinaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lhc Signals
Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
Hi all,

In 2011 CDF experiment at Tevatron announced that they had reported W+2jets signal excess for 2 jets
mass range around Mjj ~ 150 GeV but D0 experiment didn't see this signal anomaly using the same criteria.

So have anyone an idea or recent reference how this discrepancy had explained ? or did the LHC exp.
gave any other results about this W+2jets excess ..

Bests,
Safinaz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes 1 person
No problem :smile:
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top