Explaining the Inclusion of Minus Sine in the Heisenberg Hamiltonian Definition

matematikuvol
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
Why is minus sine in definition of hamiltonian

H=-\sum_{i,j}J_{i,j}(S_{i}^+S_{j}^-+S_i^zS_j^z)

Why not?

H=\sum_{i,j}J_{i,j}(S_{i}^+S_{j}^-+S_i^zS_j^z)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The choice of sign is determined by the physics. If the spins want to align (ferromagnetic) then you should have H = |J| S*S while if the spins want to anti-align (antiferromagnetic) then H=-|J|S*S is correct. Of course, you can always write H=-J S*S and then set J>0 for ferro and J<0 for anti-ferro. That's just a convention.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top