Explanation needed in angular acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating angular acceleration and average angular velocity for a disk rotating with constant angular acceleration. The problem states that the disk rotates 25 radians in 5 seconds, and participants clarify that the correct value for θ in the equation θ = ω0t + 1/2αt^2 is indeed the total angle of 25 radians, not the average angular velocity. The average angular velocity is calculated as 25 rad/5 s, resulting in 5 rad/s. This value is essential for further calculations regarding angular acceleration and instantaneous angular velocity. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
Schwatt!
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I am doing some homework from my textbook and I encountered this problem:

"Starting from rest, a disk rotates about its central axis with constant angular acceleration. In 5.0 s, it rotates 25 rad. During that time, what are the magnitudes of (a) the angular acceleration and (b) the average angular velocity? (c) Wha is the instantaneous angular velocity of the disk at the end of the 5.0 s? (d) With the angular acceleration unchanged, through what additional angle will the disk turn during the next 5.0s?"

I have a problem calculating the value for (a). I have the answer but I am not sure why I am right. Using θ = ω0t+ 1/2αt^2 and solving for a, what is the value to be used for θ? Would it be the given 25 rad. or 25 rad/5 s?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\theta is an angle, not an angular velocity.

If all else fails, use unit analysis to check what you should plug in.
 
ok so that would mean to plug in the radian measure but that number does not give the answer; the 25/5 does...
 
Schwatt! said:
ok so that would mean to plug in the radian measure but that number does not give the answer; the 25/5 does...
The 25/5 is the correct quantity, that is what Saketh was hinting at. Since;

\omega=\frac{d\theta}{dt} = \frac{25}{5} = 5\;rad.s^{-1}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top