I Explanation of Biot-Savart Law

AI Thread Summary
A current flowing through a wire generates a magnetic field, with the direction determined by the right-hand rule. Biot-Savart's Law states that the magnetic field at a point is the sum of contributions from infinitesimally small wire segments. Even if a wire segment is at an angle to a point P, it still contributes to the net magnetic field due to the vector nature of the calculation. The angle and distance from the point are crucial, as they affect the magnitude and direction of the contribution. Understanding these principles clarifies how magnetic fields are generated by current-carrying wires.
JustinoChino
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I've learned that in a wire with a current flowing through it, a magnetic field is produced, and that to determine the direction of the fields, one could match their thumb with the direction of current and curl their fingers around the wire as shown in the link below. I also learned that in Biot Savart's Law, the magnetic field at a given point P is equal to the summation of infinitesimally small magnetic fields resulting from current flowing through infinitesimally small wire segments. How can this be possible in a straight wire if the magnetic field lines are always perpendicular to the current flow? If an infinitesimally small segment of a wire is at an angle to the point P, how is it contributing to the net field at that point?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3e/Manoderecha.svg/220px-Manoderecha.svg.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Justino, :welcome:
JustinoChino said:
If an infinitesimally small segment of a wire is at an angle to the point P, how is it contributing to the net field at that point
According to ##\ \displaystyle {I\;d{\bf \vec L}\times \hat{\bf r}\over r^2}\ \ ##, a vector product that ensures that the field is perpendicular, that the angle matters and that further away current contributes less
 
  • Like
Likes ORF and vanhees71
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top