Explanation of how the ride uses forces and motion.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the forces and motion involved in rides, emphasizing the need for specific context to accurately address questions about motion initiation and cessation. Various forces such as combustion engines, gravity, and friction play roles in how rides operate. The conversation highlights that gravity can both start and stop motion, depending on its direction. Additionally, the type of ride in question, such as roller coasters, is crucial for understanding the mechanics at play. Overall, clarity about the specific ride scenario is essential for a comprehensive explanation of the forces involved.
15torril
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
What makes the motion start? What makes it stop? Does the ride move down? What force causes this motion? Does friction affect the ride? Where and how does the ride accelerate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What ride ? Without knowing that how can we answer??

Many things start motion.. combustion engines to gravity (depending on direction gravity can also slow things down)... to rocket fuel to magnetic pulling systems - to some one getting out of the car and pushing it.

Again what ride? We talking about rollercoasters?
 
We need more information about the situation. It could be friction or gravity for a lot of these, but we need to know more about the scenario.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Are frictional forces action forces or reaction forces?
Replies
14
Views
1K
B Static friction needed for rolling without slipping
Replies
4
Views
2K
Question regarding centripetal force
Replies
6
Views
2K
Inertia (and, to some extent, circular motion again)
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
Roller coaster - uniform circular motion
Replies
19
Views
3K
B Confusion while trying to build intuition of centripetal force
Replies
15
Views
3K
I Remark on centrifugal force in Heino Falcke's black hole book
Replies
22
Views
3K
B Resultant force in vertical circular motion
Replies
6
Views
3K
I How can you make a free body diagram for someone running then sliding?
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Mechanics of an inertial balance
Replies
6
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top