Explanation of Iodine Equilibrium in immiscible solvents

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the equilibrium of iodine (I2) in immiscible solvents, specifically varsol and aqueous potassium iodide (KI). Iodine prefers to dissolve in varsol, appearing pink, while in KI it forms the I3- ion, resulting in a yellow color. In Scenario 1, adding a saturated solution of I2/KI is expected to maintain the pink and yellow layers as iodine redistributes to reach equilibrium. In Scenario 2, adding saturated KI is predicted to intensify the yellow color in the aqueous layer due to increased I3- formation, while the pink layer in varsol may lighten. Changes in the concentration of reagents will affect iodine distribution between the two phases, highlighting the importance of partition coefficients.
kirsten_2009
Messages
136
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



I'm studying the equilibrium of I2 and its distribution in two immiscible liquids (varsol and aqueous potassium iodide). Since I2 is non polar; it will "prefer" to be in varsol but since KI (aq) is an ionic salt solution, iodine will also dissolve to give the I3- ion. When iodine is present in varsol = pink color and when in KI = yellow.

I think I understand what happens but I'm a little confused as to what would be observed in the following situations, any clarification would be really appreciated.

Scenario 1: 2 mL iodine/potassium iodide (aq) + 2 mL of varsol..."shake"...then add saturated solution of I2/KI ...what would be observed? What is happening on a molecular level?

Scenario 2: 2 mL iodine/potassium iodide (aq) + 2 mL of varsol..."shake"...then add saturated KI...same questions.

Homework Equations



I2 (aq) + I- <---> I3- (aq)

I2 (aq) <---> I2 (varsol)

The Attempt at a Solution



So this is my understanding of the situation, please correct me if I'm wrong. Iodine will be present in both organic and aqueous layer because its soluble in both. When Iodine is in varsol it's in the form of I- ions = pink color. When iodine is present in the aqueous KI solution its in the form of I3- ions = yellow color. So initial solutions should appear with pink varsol layer on top and yellow aqueous layer at bottom.

Scenario 1: When saturated solution of I2/KI is added I would think that nothing (no change) is observed and that the layers continue to be pink on top and yellow at bottom because more iodine is being added but also more KI so the iodine will just redistribute itself in the two layers until it's reached equilibrium. Iodine can just have more I3- since it has more solvent now to do so in (equilibrium would shift right).

Scenario 2: When saturated KI solution is added I would think that the pink layer would become lighter and the yellow layer more yellow since there is more KI for iodine to dissolve in and so more I3- ions would be formed (equilibrium would shift right).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kirsten_2009 said:
Iodine is in varsol it's in the form of I- ions I2 molecules = pink color.
Other than that little correction (you've got it that way elsewhere) I'd say you've understood the problem.
 
Great, thank-you! And as a follow up to all this and as a conclusion...in the I2 (aq) + I- (aq) <----> I3- (aq) equation if any of the reagent's concentration was changed...this would affect the iodine distribution between the two liquids, correct? But, let's say I3- was increased would that mean that the aqueous layer would be greater or more yellow because there are more I3- in the aqueous layer or would it means that because I3- was increased the reaction would shift to the left and more I2 and I- would be formed in the varsol layer thus making the varsol layer greater and more pink?
 
kirsten_2009 said:
would that mean
kirsten_2009 said:
or would it
"Yes." Both processes are going to affect the "partition" of iodine between the phases, hence, the study of "partition coefficients."
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top