Explore Why e^x Has Zero Roots Despite Being an Infinite Degree Polynomial

Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95
The function y=e^x can be expanded using the power series, thus y=e^x=1+x+\frac{x^2}{2}+\frac{x^3}{3!}+...
This is a polynomial of infinite degree, and the theorem that says a polynomial must have at least one root in the complex field, and thus this extends to a polynomial of nth degree having n roots (not necessarily distinct).

However, for e^x=0 there are zero roots. Why is this possible when, clearly by the power series for e^x it should be an infinite degree polynomial with infinite roots (in the complex plane)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
According to wiki:

In mathematics, a polynomial is an expression of finite length

so perhaps that's where the problem lies.
 
Was that definition placed before or after this exception was noticed?
 
No idea.

Actually, I have checked other source - Wolfram Mathworld - and their definition of polynomial doesn't state it has to be finite.
 
In any case, the statement "a polynomial of degree n has n zeros (counting multiplicity) over the complex field" is only true for n finite.
 
The phrase "polynomial of infinite degree" is never never used by real mathematicians. In particular e^z is not (repeat not) a polynomial in z.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top