Exploring E-e Repulsion: Stability of Half and Full P Sub-Shells Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter htneT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Repulsion
htneT
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
I am fully aware that a half filled p sub-shell is stable due to no repulsion as electrons first occupy the orbitals singly before pairing up according to Hunds rule, why is that however a fully occupied p sub-shell with 6 electrons is also considered stable? Where as a filled s sub-shell with 2 electrons is said to undergo e-e repulsion, hence the I.E value of He is less than that of Hydrogen's I.E by a factor of 2 (90% to be exact).

In short: Why is a full p sub-shell with 6 electrons not said to undergo e-e repulsion (considered stable), whereas a full s sub-shell with 2 electrons is said to undergo e-e repulsion (unstable).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ionization energy of Helium is a little less than twice that of atomic hydrogen, i.e. helium is more inert than atomic hydrogen.
See the table of values here.
 
Doesn't it have to do with e-e repulsion?
 
htneT said:
Doesn't it have to do with e-e repulsion?
Does what have to do with electron-electron repulsion? You said that helium has a lower ionization energy than helium, which is not the case. Similarly you are talking about p sub-shells but only referring to hydrogen and helium, which only have half and fully filled 1s sub-shells respectively.
 
Vagn said:
Does what have to do with electron-electron repulsion? You said that helium has a lower ionization energy than helium, which is not the case. Similarly you are talking about p sub-shells but only referring to hydrogen and helium, which only have half and fully filled 1s sub-shells respectively.
My main question is why is a full p sub-shell considered stable, whereas a full s sub-shell considered unstable and its electrons undergo e-e repulsion?
 
htneT said:
Where as a filled s sub-shell with 2 electrons is said to undergo e-e repulsion
Each electron in a multi-electron atom will of course experience e-e repulsion regardless of which subshell the electron under consideration occupies.
htneT said:
a full s sub-shell considered unstable
What is the measure of stability/instability you are using, I.E.? Ionization energy is not only determined by the number of electrons present in the atom, but also by the nuclear charge.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top