How Do Elliptically Polarized Plane Waves Form from Perpendicular Plane Waves?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the formation of elliptically polarized plane waves from two perpendicular plane-polarized waves with differing phases. It is established that the superposition of these waves results in an elliptically polarized wave, provided they share the same propagation constant. The time-average Poynting vector of the resulting elliptically polarized wave is shown to equal the sum of the time-average Poynting vectors of the two original waves. Participants express confusion regarding the manipulation of complex quantities and the application of Euler's formula in this context. Overall, the thread emphasizes the mathematical relationships and properties of plane waves and their superposition.
schrodingerscat11
Messages
86
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hi! The entire problem is this:

(a) Two plane-polarized harmonic plane waves having the same propagation constant are polarized, respectively, along two perpendicular directions. Show that if the phases of the two waves are different, their superposition yields generally an elliptically polarized plane wave.
(b) Show that the time-average Poynting vector of an elliptically polarized plane wave is equal to the sum of the time-average, Poynting vectors of the two orthogonal plane-polarized waves into which it can be decomposed.

Homework Equations


Plane waves
Def: a constant-frequency wave whose wavefronts (surfaces of constant phase) are infinite parallel planes of constant peak-to-peak amplitude normal to the phase velocity vector (Wikipedia).
A(x,t)=A_ocos(kx-\omega t +\phi)
A(\mathbf{r},t)=A_o cos(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t +\phi)
A(\mathbf{r},t)=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t +\phi)}

where
A(x,t) is the wave height at position x and t.
A_o is the amplitude
k is the wave number
\phi is the phase constant
\omega is the angular frequency

Propagation constant:

\frac{A_o}{A_x}=e^{\gamma x}
\gamma=\alpha+i\beta
\beta=k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}
where
A_x and A_o are the amplitude at position x and the amplitude at source of propagation, respectively.
\gamma is the propagation constant
\alpha is the attenuation constant
\beta is the phase constant

Equation of an ellipse:
\frac{x^2}{a}+\frac{y^2}{b}=1
whose parametric equations are
x=a ~ cos ~t
y=b ~sin ~t

The Attempt at a Solution



So far these are the things that I am not sure:
  • I now know that plane waves have mathematical forms as given above. My question is how will they change if they become harmonic?
  • I assume that plane polarization means that if \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t) is a vector, the disturbance is along a certain direction only. That is,\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t +\phi)}\mathbf{\hat{x}} is said to be plane polarized along the x direction. Right?
  • If the propagation constant is the same, I assume the phase constant is also the same which means that k is the same for both plane waves. Also by the definition of propagation constant above, the amplitude of the two plane waves are equal any time. Right?
  • I am utterly confused on which among these quantities are complex and which are real. Hence, I don't know how to manipulate the exponential parts or if I can apply Euler's formula to simplify these.
My attempt for (a):
Let the first plane wave be
\mathbf{A_1}(\mathbf{r},t)=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t +\phi)}\mathbf{\hat{x}}=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t )}e^{\phi}\mathbf{\hat{x}}
and the second plane wave be
\mathbf{A_2}(\mathbf{r},t)=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t +\psi)}\mathbf{\hat{y}}=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t )}e^{\psi}\mathbf{\hat{y}}

Taking their superposition:
\mathbf{A}=\mathbf{A_1}+\mathbf{A_2}
\mathbf{A}=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t )}e^{\phi}\mathbf{\hat{x}}+A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t )}e^{\psi}\mathbf{\hat{y}}
\mathbf{A}=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t )}(e^{\phi}\mathbf{\hat{x}}+e^{\psi}\mathbf{\hat{y}})
1=\frac{A_o}{\mathbf{A}}e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t )}(e^{\phi}\mathbf{\hat{x}}+e^{\psi}\mathbf{\hat{y}})

I want to recast this to the form of equation of an ellipse (see relevant equations above) but I'm stuck.

Thank you very much.
 
Thanks. No info yet. :( But I think the equation of ellipse above is wrong. I think I should put the equation of an oblique ellipse. That's all.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top