Exploring Laplace's Equation: Separation of Variables Method in Electrodynamics

AI Thread Summary
Laplace's equation is frequently encountered in physics, particularly in electrodynamics, and understanding its solutions is crucial. The separation of variables method is commonly used, but its validity relies on the chosen functions satisfying the specific PDE and boundary conditions. The discussion highlights that while some solutions may not be directly obtainable through this method, they can still be expressed as expansions in terms of solutions derived from it, following Sturm–Liouville theory. Additionally, the relationship between the derived solutions and their application in electrostatics is clarified, emphasizing that even non-sinusoidal solutions can be represented using sine functions. This understanding reinforces the importance of the completeness of the solution set in solving various PDEs.
vikasagartha
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am studying Laplace's equation in my electrodynamics course (using griffiths intro to electrodynamics). I am watching a youtube video stepping through the separation of variables method for solving the PDE. It seems to be a common PDE that comes up repeatedly in physics (Helmholtz eqn, Poisson eqn) and I thought it would be worthwhile to understand where the solution comes from.

In the text Griffiths also touches on two additional points:
- "A solution to Laplace's equation has the property that the average value over a spherical surface is equal to the value at the center of the sphere"
- A uniqueness theorem

A first question that came to my mind: why do we assume that separation of variables works? How can we assume that the solution is of the form f(x)g(y)? What if it had an expression like x^y?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The functions chosen as solutions using separation of variables must be shown to be solutions of the particular PDE and to satisfy whatever boundary conditions apply. These requirements eliminate many elementary functions from consideration, because they cannot satisfy one or both of these requirements.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Okay, a second question: I watched Chris Tisdell's (youtube) derivation of the solution in two dimensions, and it involves a summation of a sine function (a Fourier series of sorts). In electrostatics, the solution of the equation generates a potential function V, which we get by taking a path integral \int \vec{E}\cdot\vec{dl}. I've done many such problems and never see any sinusoidal functions in there...why is that? Does the solution look different in 3D or am I misunderstanding the relation between the derivation of the solution and its application to electrostatics?
 
What you have to understand is that the separation method gives you a complete set of solutions (there are theorems that prove that for a fairly large group of PDE problems called Sturm–Liouville equations.) What that means is that even though there are solutions that cannot be obtained by the separation of variables method, these solutions can be written as an expansion in terms of the solutions obtained by the separation of variables method. This expansion is a generalization of the Fourier expansion. So, even though the final solution may not be sinusoidal at all, it can still be expanded in terms of sine functions because the set of sine functions form a complete set according with Sturm–Liouville theory.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top