B Can Understanding Spacetime Lead to Time Travel?

Dheer Parikh
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Correct me if I am wrong and pls answer to my question .The 4th dimension is also known as SPACETIME.Does it mean that if we if are able to understand it and if we apply it,we can travel space and time?If Yes then, will we be able to construct TIME MACHINE and travel through time?and also through space quick easier than that of today?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dheer Parikh said:
The 4th dimension is also known as SPACETIME.

This is incorrect. Spacetime is a framework constructed by merging all three physical dimensions and the time dimension together. The 4th dimension is time.

Read more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime

Dheer Parikh said:
Does it mean that if we if are able to understand it and if we apply it,we can travel space and time?If Yes then, will we be able to construct TIME MACHINE and travel through time?and also through space quick easier than that of today?

We already understand spacetime very well. Well enough to make predictions that have yet to be found inaccurate or incorrect. While we can already travel through space in any direction and speed of our choosing (within physical possibilities), we are constrained to traveling through time in a single direction. It is unlikely that future understanding will lead to time travel. Not only does it violate multiple physical laws (any one of which are extremely important and practically a requirement for all of modern physics), but the various paradoxes that crop up cast serious doubt on its possibility.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale and bhobba
Dheer Parikh said:
The 4th dimension is also known as SPACETIME.
Time is usually considered the "4th dimension". Since space and time are intertwined, all four are called spacetime.

Dheer Parikh said:
Does it mean that if we if are able to understand it and if we apply it,we can travel space and time?
We already do travel space and time. Knowledge of spacetime does not give you any special powers.

Dheer Parikh said:
If Yes then, will we be able to construct TIME MACHINE and travel through time?
No.

Dheer Parikh said:
and also through space quick easier than that of today?
In a sense, yes. We understand how great distances can be covered if only we can move fast enough.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Doc Al said:
Time is usually considered the "4th dimension". Since space and time are intertwined, all four are called spacetime.We already do travel space and time. Knowledge of spacetime does not give you any special powers.No.In a sense, yes. We understand how great distances can be covered if only we can move fast enough.
I beg to differ on this one, as knowledge of spacetime can give you the special power to awe and amaze young physics students. :wink:
 
Battlemage! said:
I beg to differ on this one, as knowledge of spacetime can give you the special power to awe and amaze young physics students. :wink:
You got me there. :smile:
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top