Why Is There a Difference Between Loss in GPE and Gain in EPE in Spring Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the discrepancy between the loss in gravitational potential energy (GPE) and the gain in elastic potential energy (EPE) when a spring is stretched. The calculated loss in GPE is 0.785 J, while the gain in EPE is 0.392 J, leading to confusion about the difference. Participants highlight the importance of correctly applying formulas and understanding the forces involved in the calculations. Additionally, there is a query regarding the resultant force when the spring is set into simple harmonic motion (SHM) with an amplitude of 0.200m. Clarification is sought on the calculations and the underlying physics principles.
qazxsw11111
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
A spring has an unstretched length of 0.650 and a weight of 0.400kg is attached and gently lowered till eqm point is reached. The spring is then stretched by a distance of 0.200m.

Loss in gpe=mgh=0.200x0.650x9.81=0.785 J
Gain in EPE=0.5 Fx= 0.5 x 0.400x 9.81 x 0.200=0.392 (?) Actually I don't really understand why this is so. But it is the answer.

Why are the two answers different?

Furthermore, if the spring is set into SHM with amplitude 0.200m, what is the resultant force at the lowest point of movement?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
qazxsw11111 said:
A spring has an unstretched length of 0.650 and a weight of 0.400kg is attached and gently lowered till eqm point is reached. The spring is then stretched by a distance of 0.200m.

Loss in gpe=mgh=0.200x9.81x9.81=0.785 J
Gain in EPE=0.5 Fx=0.392J

Why are the two answers different?

Furthermore, if the spring is set into SHM with amplitude 0.200m, what is the resultant force at the lowest point of movement?

in your gpe calc you use g twice and have no mass. Where Are you getting F for your epe? spell it out a little more for us.
 
Opps I typed too fast. I don't really understand why the EPE is so though...though I listed out the step according to answer scheme given. Anyone can help clarify?

Thanks.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top