Exploring the Angular Size-Redshift Relation in Cosmology

  • Thread starter Thread starter TrickyDicky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular Relation
AI Thread Summary
The angular size-redshift relation is a critical aspect of testing cosmological models, particularly the L-CDM model, which predicts unusual behavior at redshifts above z=1.6. However, this area faces significant technical challenges due to the high redshift observations. Recent literature, including Gurvits 1998, remains inconclusive, with some observations deviating from L-CDM predictions. There is a noted scarcity of observational data supporting the expected increase in angular size for objects with z>1.5, highlighting a weakness in the CDM model. The discussion suggests a need for more recent studies to clarify these discrepancies.
TrickyDicky
Messages
3,507
Reaction score
28
The angular size-redshift relation has always looked like an interesting way to test cosmological ideas since the L-CDM model predicts this apparently strange behaviour for redshifts higher than around z=1.6, but sadly is plagued with technical difficulties arisin mainly from these very high redshifts. I recently read something (Gurvits 1998) but it's quite dated and it was rather inconclusive with several observations outside the values predicted by the L-CDM model. Perhaps someone knows about more recent observations the shed light about this issue. Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The lack of observational data in accordance with the predicted increase in angular size for objects with z>1.5 is one of the many weak points of the CDM model but you won't find much information about it in this forum since they tend to ignore anything that doesn't support the standard view.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top