What Do Hard and Soft Spectrums Really Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicksauce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard
AI Thread Summary
The terms "hard" and "soft" in spectra refer to the energy levels and frequencies of the emitted radiation. Hard gamma rays possess higher energy, frequency, and shorter wavelengths compared to soft gamma rays. In the context of neutron star atmospheres, a "harder" spectrum indicates a shift towards higher energy emissions compared to blackbody spectra. This shift suggests that the flux in light element atmospheres exceeds that of blackbody radiation. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for interpreting astrophysical phenomena.
nicksauce
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,270
Reaction score
7
"Hard" Spectrum

What exactly is meant when a spectrum is said to be "hard" or "soft", or "harder"/"softer" compared to a different spectrum?


Cheers,
Nick
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


Hard gamma rays, for example, have higher energy, higher frequency, and shorter wavelength than soft gamma rays.
 


Thanks George Jones. I'm not entirely sure if that answers my question though.

For example consider the following from "Model neutron star atmospheres with low magnetic fields" Zavlin, Pavlov, Shibanov 1996. Astron. Astrophys 315, 141-152. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9604072

In the abstract they write "... We show that the model atmosphere spectra are substantially different from the black-body spectra. For light element atmospheres, the flux is greater than the blackbody flux, and the spectrum is harder..."

What is the meaning of harder in this context?
 


From the paper
The maxima of the spectra ... , i.e., they are shifted by a factor of 1.6 - 1.8 from the corresponding blackbody maxima towards higher energies.
 


Ah... thank you very much.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top