Can a Spinning Astronaut Use a Tethered Bowling Ball to Gain Motion in Space?

AI Thread Summary
A spinning astronaut can use a tethered bowling ball to gain motion in space by utilizing the principles of momentum conservation. When the astronaut throws the bowling ball, they will experience a backward motion due to the action-reaction principle, but this motion may be partially negated by the recoil of the tether. The astronaut's rotation rate will be affected by the energy expended during the throw, but the overall mass remains unchanged. The only way to gain relative motion without sacrificing mass or cutting the tether is to leverage gravitational attraction. Ultimately, while the tethered bowling ball can be used to manipulate motion, its effectiveness is limited by the conservation of momentum.
moses1592
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Consider this scenario: two astronauts are floating in outer space with no other frame of reference other than themselves. Relative to one another they are stationary and have no motion between them, except that one astronaut is spinning at one revolution per second. The astronaut that is spinning is tightly holding a bowling ball against his chest. The bowling ball is also tethered to him on a long cable.

The spinning astronaut has potential (muscle) energy in his body which allows him to toss the bowling ball if he desires. He also has potential energy in his spin. If he slowly releases the bowling ball on the tether his rotation will slow down but he will remain stationary and won't feel a force of acceleration. If he pulls it back in then his spin will increase back to its original 1 rotation per second. Let's say he violently throws the ball as hard as he can.

The moment he let's go he will be pushed and begin moving backwards as the ball proportionally moves forward, except he will still be spinning while the ball is moving. I believe the ball Will have some rotation as well. This of course will be negated (at least partially) when the ball reaches the end of the tether and recoils.

Will this inevitable recoil always 100% negate any relative motion created by throwing the ball? Would this act alter the rotation rate of the astronaut since energy was spent in the act of the throw/recoil? I know any time an object/system expends energy it loses a tiny amount of mass, but for this scenario assume it's so small as to be negligible.

In closing, is there any way for the spinning astronaut to use his tethered bowling ball, potential muscle and/or rotational energy to gain motion relative to his buddy astronaut without sacrificing mass or cutting the tether?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about the implications of momentum conservation here...
 
moses1592 said:
In closing, is there any way for the spinning astronaut to use his tethered bowling ball, potential muscle and/or rotational energy to gain motion relative to his buddy astronaut without sacrificing mass or cutting the tether?

He will gain motion relative to his buddy due to gravitational attraction. Without sacrificing reaction mass all he can do is using the bowling ball to increase this effect.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top