Exponential behavior in elasticity?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on a proposed model of elasticity that uses differential strain and a modified form of Hooke's law to describe the behavior of elastic materials under uniaxial compression. The model suggests an exponential relationship between stress and elongation, expressed as ##y(P)=y_o e^{-P/E}##, which the author claims fits well for various elastic materials. However, some participants question the novelty of the model, suggesting it essentially reiterates established principles of elasticity, particularly Hooke's law. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in defining new constitutive relations in the context of elasticity. Overall, the proposal raises important questions about the interpretation and application of existing elasticity theories.
mresimulator
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I know some constitutive models for elastic materials like Neo-Hooke or Mooney-Rivlin, which give a relation between elongation ##\lambda=y/y_o## (where ##y## and ##y_o## are the length of the elastic material in a uniaxial compression test in the direction of the compression at stress ##P## and ##P=0##, respectively).

I propose the next model of elasticity:

1) Using the differential definition of strain ##d\epsilon \equiv \frac{dy}{y}##

2) Using the equality ##-\frac{dP}{E} = d\epsilon##, assuming ##E## is the 'Young's modulus' of the material.

3) Using this two equations, taking ##E## constant, and using the boundary conditions ##y(P=0)=y_o## we get ##y(P)=y_o e^{-P/E}##.

This exponential curve fits very well for many of my elastic materials.

My question is: Is wrong this model? (conceptually speaking).

Best regards.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps I'm not understanding your idea (the text is somewhat garbled), but I don't see where you are proposing a 'new' constitutive relation- you simply used Hooke's law (sort of generalized to 3-D, I suppose).
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
29K