MHB How Do You Calculate the Probability in an Exponential Distribution?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the probability for a random variable Y with an EXP(2) distribution, the cumulative distribution function (CDF) can be used. The CDF is defined as P[X ≤ x] = 1 - e^(-λx). For P(Y > 1), the calculation involves finding P(Y ≤ 1) first, which is 1 - e^(-2*1), resulting in approximately 0.8467. Consequently, P(Y > 1) is calculated as 1 - 0.8467, yielding a final probability of about 0.1353. This method effectively demonstrates the application of the CDF in determining probabilities in exponential distributions.
das1
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Help?

Suppose the random variable Y has an EXP(2) distribution. What is P(Y > 1)? (Round to four decimal places as appropriate.)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
das said:
Help?

Suppose the random variable Y has an EXP(2) distribution. What is P(Y > 1)? (Round to four decimal places as appropriate.)

Are you allowed to use the CDF for this distribution or should you calculate this purely from the pdf? Either way you'll need to also use this fact: $$P[Y>2]=1-P[Y \le 2]$$
 
I don't think there are any restrictions on what functions I can or can't use
 
das said:
I don't think there are any restrictions on what functions I can or can't use

Ok, then this should be very useful. For the exponential distribution, the CDF is the following: $$P[X \le x]=1-e^{-\lambda x}$$. How can you use this to answer your question?
 
So would I plug in 1 for x and 2 for λ?
Then we would get 1-e^(-2*1)? Which is .8467 but we'd actually want 1-.8467 again because we're looking for P(Y > 1) right? So about .1353?
 
That looks good to me! (Yes)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top