Exponents Notation: Multiplying, Dividing, & Parentheses

C0nfused
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
Hi
I have a small question about exponents: when we write a^x (i will write it this way but i talk about the traditional notation) this means that the base is only a? I mean that if we have ba^x or -a^x then then these are equal to b(a^x) and -(a^x) ? These are also because of the order of operations? Generally if we want a "whole expression" to be raised in a power then we have to write it in a parentheses? So for example -2^2=-4 but (-2)^2=4 ?
So we calculate this exponent and then do multiplications, divisions etc..?
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
i agree with you. i.e. i use the notation as you have said.


one remark: if you intend also to raise your base to fractional powers, like 1/2,

then you are particularly advised that, if you are dealing with real numbers, the base should be positive, since (-1)^*1/2) is not a real number.

i.e. in ordinary calculus courses about real numbers, in first and second year in most US universities, a^x should only be used when a is positive (or zero). I.e. if you intend a^x to be a function defiend for all real numbers x, or even for all rational numbers x, then a should be positive.
 
Yes, it is based on "order of operations". -22= - 2*2= -4 because exponentiation takes precedence: it is -(2)(2). (-2)2= (-2)(-2)= 4 because of the parentheses.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top