Express h in Terms of r and theta: Rotational Physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on expressing the height h in terms of the radius r and the angle theta for a disc rotating due to a falling block. Initially, the user attempts to derive h using energy conservation, but others clarify that the problem is fundamentally geometric. The correct relationship is established as h = r*theta, reflecting the winding constraint of the string around the disc's hub. This geometric approach simplifies the problem, eliminating the need for gravitational acceleration and time in the final expression. The consensus emphasizes the importance of recognizing the geometric nature of the relationship in rotational physics.
scifan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So the question is this:

A disc is released from rest. A block is causing it to rotate. After a time t the block has fallen a height h and the disc has rotated through an angle theta. (in rad)
Express h in terms of r (the radius of the part of the hub around which the string is wound) and theta.

I came up with this answer:

PE lost = KE gained
mgh = (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)I(omega)^2
mgh = (1/2)m(r*omega)^2 + (1/2)*(mr^2)omega^2
gh = (1/2)r^2*omega^2 + (1/2)omega^2*r^2
gh = omega^2*r^2
omega = d(theta)/dt
subs for omega and solve for h: h = (r^2*theta^2)/(t^2*g)

The question asks me to express h in terms of r and theta but my answer has g and t in it. Any help?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi scifan! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
scifan said:
A disc is released from rest. A block is causing it to rotate. After a time t the block has fallen a height h and the disc has rotated through an angle theta. (in rad)
Express h in terms of r (the radius of the part of the hub around which the string is wound) and theta.

read the question! :rolleyes:

energy has nothing to do with it …

this is just geometry!
 


tiny-tim said:
hi scifan! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)


read the question! :rolleyes:

energy has nothing to do with it …

this is just geometry!


Would that be correct if I say h = r*theta then?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top