Expressing one Vector in terms of others

  • Thread starter Thread starter DistinctlyPlain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on expressing the vector Rs in terms of the vectors r1 and r2, which represent positions relative to the center of mass between two bodies, m1 and m2. The key equations presented are R3-1 = r1 - Rs and R3-2 = r2 - Rs. It is established that r1 and r2 are linearly dependent and span a one-dimensional space, indicating that Rs cannot be expressed as a linear combination of r1 and r2. The correct approach involves redefining the vectors to express both positions in terms of Rs and r1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector mathematics and linear dependence
  • Familiarity with the concept of center of mass in physics
  • Basic knowledge of mass ratios and their implications in vector relationships
  • Ability to manipulate and redefine vector equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study linear dependence and independence in vector spaces
  • Explore the concept of center of mass and its mathematical implications
  • Learn about vector transformations and redefinitions in physics
  • Investigate the relationship between mass ratios and vector expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector relationships and center of mass calculations.

DistinctlyPlain
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

6pvAr0Q.jpg


I am very rusty on my mathematics and I am wondering if there is a way to express Rs in terms of r1 and r2. The positions of the bodies are all relative to the origin 0 (C.o.M between m1 and m2). Basically I'm trying to express the two vectors coming from m3 in terms of the masses and position vectors for m1 and m2.

Homework Equations



R[/B]3-1 = r1-Rs
R3-2 = r2-Rs

The Attempt at a Solution



I think r1 and r2 are related through the expression: r2= -(m1/m2)*r1 but this was very much 'fudged' so I think I'm approaching the problem wrong.

Any help much appreciated.
Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clearly, r1, r2 are linearly dependent and span a 1-D space. Rs can never be an linearly combination of them. I think it would be more natural if you define that "r1-Rs" vector to be r1 and "r2-Rs" to be r2.
 
DistinctlyPlain said:
think r1 and r2 are related through the expression: r2= -(m1/m2)*r1
Yes, use that, so you can express both positions in terms of Rs and r1.
 

Similar threads

Problem about a rigid body pulled by a mass
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Find the instant of the collision
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Change in the Earth's orbit radius from changing mass of the Sun
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Electricity: ammeter range calculation
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Proving Newton's third law invariant with Galilean tranfrom
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Coulomb force and charge equilibrium on the xy-plane
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Voltage drop and current through each resistor
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Expression for voltage across resistor in circuit
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Grounded conductor and Electric field potential question ?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Center of mass using Mach's restatement of Newtonian Mechanics
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K