Expressing start of a vector using a point on the vector

  • Thread starter Thread starter yotama9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Vector
yotama9
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi guys. I hope this is the right thread for my question. The question is for my project and I can assure you it's not my homework. I know the solution to my problem isn't that complicated but I just lost my self with the problem and I don't have anyone to talk with about my problem.

Anyhow, here is my problem. I need to find the forces between two rods. Each rod is constructed from 3 particles (O--O--O) and the potential between the rod is given by:
U = f(\bar r) \cdot g(\bar u_1 - \bar u_2).


Where

\bar r = \bar r_{22} - r_{21}

That is, r is the distance between the two middle particles. \bar u_i is give by

\bar u_i = \bar r_{i3} - \bar r_{i1}

which means it is the vector that shows the direction of the rod. I need to find forces between the particles:

F = \frac{dU}{dr}.

My problem is with the derivative of \bar u_1 - \bar u_2 with respect to \bar r. I tried several ways but I alway end up with \frac{du_1}{d \bar r} - \frac{du_2}{d \bar r}.

What have I missed?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is what you should end up with. Now what is the real difficulty?
 
The problem is to express the derivative as a function of the distance between the two vectors.
Thanks
 
yotama9 said:
The problem is to express the derivative as a function of the distance between the two vectors.
Thanks

Which you did. So what is the difficulty ?
 
I don't know how to compute the derivative. I feel like I'm missing something here
 
Hi, I'm bumping the problem up again.
I'll try to clarify my problem. I need to find the forces on ball number 1 and ball number 3 of each chain. I know that it should have something with the distance between the balls (\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2) and the angle (\theta[\tex]) but I&#039;m not sure what it is. <br /> <br /> Thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top