Extremely low on resistance LDR?

  • Thread starter Thread starter coinmaster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ldr Resistance
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges of using Light Dependent Resistors (LDRs) as variable AC attenuators, specifically the need for an on-resistance lower than 10 ohms. Participants highlight that typical LDRs have a minimum on-resistance of 100 ohms, and using a brighter light source may not yield the desired results. The application involves audio frequencies and requires adjustable impedance at a DC bias point. Alternative methods for achieving variable attenuation, such as using MOSFETs, are also explored, with concerns raised about the limitations of LDRs and their internal capacitance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Light Dependent Resistors (LDRs)
  • Familiarity with MOSFET operation and applications
  • Knowledge of audio frequency circuits
  • Basic principles of variable resistors and attenuators
NEXT STEPS
  • Research alternative variable resistor technologies, such as digital potentiometers
  • Explore the use of operational amplifiers for signal attenuation
  • Investigate the impact of internal capacitance on LDR performance in audio applications
  • Learn about circuit design techniques for adjustable impedance in amplifiers
USEFUL FOR

Electronics engineers, audio circuit designers, and hobbyists seeking to implement variable attenuation in audio applications.

coinmaster
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I need a variable AC attenuator and the only thing I can think of is an LDR.
However I would need the on resistance to be very low, less than 10 ohms.

I've only found LDRs with on resistances of 100ohms minimum.
Is it possible to go lower than the listed minimum is I use a really really bright light?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
coinmaster said:
I need a variable AC attenuator and the only thing I can think of is an LDR.
However I would need the on resistance to be very low, less than 10 ohms.

I've only found LDRs with on resistances of 100ohms minimum.
Is it possible to go lower than the listed minimum is I use a really really bright light?
Can you say more about your circuit requirements? There are other ways to make variable attenuators. What are your voltage and current requirements?
 
berkeman said:
Can you say more about your circuit requirements? There are other ways to make variable attenuators. What are your voltage and current requirements?

Hmmm, voltage requirements will probably be very wide, from -600 to 0v maybe. Current will be 0-100ma.
 
coinmaster said:
Hmmm, voltage requirements will probably be very wide, from -600 to 0v maybe. Current will be 0-100ma.
You said "AC attenuator". What frequencies? Can you say what the application is? What range of attenuation do you need?
 
Audio frequencies. The application is an amplifier where I need an adjustable impedance at a DC bias point. The DC adjustment will be done via a source follower but the signal needs a separately adjustable attenuation.
 
I tried using a mosfet in LTspice in parallel with a resistor to create a variable resistance but for some reason it never reaches the source voltage when the resistance becomes zero. For example if the source voltage is 100v then at zero resistance the other size of the resistor should be 100v, but it comes out much lower. Is this a glitch in LTspice or is there some reason for this?
 
coinmaster said:
Audio frequencies. The application is an amplifier where I need an adjustable impedance at a DC bias point. The DC adjustment will be done via a source follower but the signal needs a separately adjustable attenuation.
Can you post a block diagram of what you are trying to do?
 
Screenshot_5.png

Source follower sets the bias voltage for the load. I need to adjust the AC signal as well, hence my problem.
 
Last edited:
coinmaster said:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/96634
Source follower sets the bias voltage for the load. I need to adjust the AC signal as well, hence my problem.
I'm not able to see the circuit parts -- they are too light for my viewer. Can you post a darker/enhanced version? Thanks.
 
  • #10
Edited.
 
  • #11
I am not sure what it is but I have wondered about the capacitance of LDRs. I too had the same idea long long ago about using them in pi network configuration as a variable attenuator but someone mentioned that their internal capacitance may not be suitable for this. Something to keep in mind.
 
  • #12
I just did a quick reference of an LDR datasheet, It showed a 5pf capacitance. Doesn't seem like enough to affect the frequency response, the mosfet has more gate capacitance.
The problem is LDRs don't have a low enough on resistance.
I'm wondering if I use an extra bright light source I can exceed the datasheet specs.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
coinmaster said:
I just did a quick reference of an LDR datasheet, It showed a 5pf capacitance. Doesn't seem like enough to affect the frequency response, the mosfet has more gate capacitance.
The problem is LDRs don't have a low enough on resistance.
I'm wondering if I use an extra bright light source I can exceed the datasheet specs.
How low do you need to go?
 
  • #14
Optimally, under 1 ohm. Basically as far low as possible.
 
  • #15
Care to explain a little more what you are trying to do? Maybe there is a way for the circuit to be changed? I am curious to know more about this.
 
  • #16
Um, I would love to give you a schematic but this is for a product I've spent countless hours on developing so I'd prefer not to.
I don't think there is another way though, it's a difficult hurdle to get around.
 
  • #17
coinmaster said:
Um, I would love to give you a schematic but this is for a product I've spent countless hours on developing so I'd prefer not to.

ohhh dear, how often we hear that cry :rolleyes::rolleyes:

"I have invented something so wonderful that is going to revolutionise the world"

it's hard for people to help you if you won't let them help by sharing the appropriate infoD
 
  • #18
davenn said:
ohhh dear, how often we hear that cry :rolleyes:
D
I'm sure :-p
 
  • #19
Well that is one of the pains of inventing. Often times there is a case where many people know that 'if it weren't for THIS, then a whole new process for THAT could be implemented'. It is the one guy who overcomes the THIS who stands to gain. So tell me, do you think someone will solve a problem like THIS on an internet forum? Suspecting you are up against such a thing why would anyone even choose to? I recall a number of years ago I was in your situation and asked a question on this forum about whether a specific part exists off the shelf. I got lots of questions and suggestions. I was not in a position to reveal any more information so I just had to live with doing it the hard way and take a chance of reinventing the wheel so to speak. Lesson learned.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K