A F-test regression test, when and how?

AI Thread Summary
F-tests can be used to compare nested regression models, but the discussion raises confusion about comparing two models with the same form but different coefficients. The proposed approach is to test each model against a reduced model, Y = b, rather than comparing the two models directly. Bayesian analysis is suggested as an alternative for model comparison, particularly using the Bayes factor, though it is noted to be sensitive to prior assumptions. The conversation also highlights the importance of context and clarity in model setup to ensure valid comparisons. Overall, the need for rigorous testing methods in the analysis of model outputs is emphasized.
RobosaurusRex
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
I am aware that f-tests can be used to check the null hypothesis when comparing regression models if the models are nested.

What I am confused about is if I can apply an f-test to compare the following, (and if so what is the best way)

I have two regression laws
Y = a1*X1 + a2*X2 + b
Y = a3*X1 + a4*X2 + b

Is the best way to test these quantitatively to compare each in turn against the reduced model Y = b
or can I compare them against one another directly by using the f-test?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Personally, I would use a Bayesian analysis for this. You can easily select models based on the Bayes factor. But it is sensitive to your prior
 
Dale said:
Personally, I would use a Bayesian analysis for this. You can easily select models based on the Bayes factor. But it is sensitive to your prior

I have been trying to follow the analysis of a paper where they claim that f-tests show model a is significantly better than model b.
Any ideas?

If not, can you link me to something regarding this bayesian analysis?
 
Well, comparing the two models you described seems strange since they are the same form. I don't know why you would have two models of the same form with different coefficients from the same data set.

However, there certainly is plenty of information about Bayesian statistics

I would start here for a basic intro
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_probability
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_inference

And here for a basic practical method
http://www.indiana.edu/~kruschke/BEST/BEST.pdf
 
I agree with Dale; usually you input data into some software and the software will spit out a model together with goodness of fit info related to the test at hand. Unless your software is doing iterations and gave you different ones, I don't see why you would end up with different models. Would you explain the setup you are using?
 
WWGD said:
I agree with Dale; usually you input data into some software and the software will spit out a model together with goodness of fit info related to the test at hand. Unless your software is doing iterations and gave you different ones, I don't see why you would end up with different models. Would you explain the setup you are using?
Hi sorry for the lack on context, this may help.

So i have a bunch of model output which essentially boils down to a plot of X against Y, where X can either contain one or two variables

There are two derived 'scalings' based on the governing physics nd I want to test if the two are quantitatively different when describing the data.
So I want to be quite rigorous, I have done some 'relative misfit' calculations and now I am trying to do an f-test as it was performed in the literature but obviously they dedicate a sentence to the result and nothing about how it is done
 
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top