F(-x) is a reflection over the y axis -f(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter hb20007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axis Reflection
hb20007
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
f(-x) is a reflection over the y axis
-f(x) is a reflection over the x axis

Now, how do we represent a reflection over y=x?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Its f^{-1}(x)
Very beautiful!
 
hb20007 said:
f(-x) is a reflection over the y axis
-f(x) is a reflection over the x axis

Now, how do we represent a reflection over y=x?

If (x, y) is a point on the graph of f, (y, x) will be the reflection of that point across the line y = x.

Shyan said:
Its f^{-1}(x)
Very beautiful!
What if f doesn't have an inverse? For example, y = f(x) = x2. This function is not one-to-one, so doesn't have an inverse.
 
Mark44 said:
If (x, y) is a point on the graph of f, (y, x) will be the reflection of that point across the line y = x.What if f doesn't have an inverse? For example, y = f(x) = x2. This function is not one-to-one, so doesn't have an inverse.

If a function is not one to one,then there is no function that is its inverse.But there is of course a relation which is the function's inverse.And that relation can be ploted.For y=x^2 we have x=\pm \sqrt{y}which is a two-valued relation between x and y.
 
Understood. My point was that you can't refer to it as f-1(x).
 
Mark44 said:
If (x, y) is a point on the graph of f, (y, x) will be the reflection of that point across the line y = x.


What if f doesn't have an inverse? For example, y = f(x) = x2. This function is not one-to-one, so doesn't have an inverse.

Every function is a relation. If ##R## is a relation, then ##R^{-1}## is a well-defined relation.
 
Okay, now how about a reflection over y = -x?
 
Let's see...a reflection over line y=-x means (x_0,y_0)\rightarrow(-y_0,-x_0).
It think it should be -f^{-1}(-x)...ohh...sorry...-R^{-1}(-x).
 
Yeah, makes sense...
Thanks :biggrin:
 
Back
Top