F(x) = sin(-3x) increase decrease intervals

vaze
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone.

Could anyone help me solve this. I need to find the increase and decrease intervals of f(x) = sin(-3x).

The increase intervals of sin(x) are -\pi/2 + 2\pi*k < x < \pi/2 + 2\pi*k

Is the following the right way to solve my problem (for increase intervals)? -\pi/2 + 2\pi*k < -3x < \pi/2 + 2\pi*k
By multiplying by -3 you get: -\pi/6 + 2/3\pi*k < x < \pi/6 + 2/3\pi*k (1)

Although when plotting sin(-3x) this interval (1) is the decrease one. Why?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
sin(-3x)=-sin(3x). Work with this form, since you don't have to work with things going in opposite directions.
 
How would you use sin(x) = -sin(x) in this problem?
 
vaze said:
How would you use sin(x) = -sin(x) in this problem?
If sin(x) is increasing then -sin(x) is decreasing, vice versa.
 
Yes, thank you. I have already solved it this way. My textbook had an error in the solutions sheet. They just solved the double inequality and did not exchange the increase and decrease intervals.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top