Fabricating bipedal-ish walker legs,

  • Thread starter Thread starter jehan60188
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    solidworks
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around creating a single-actuator walker for a class project, which involves two unpowered wheels and two legs. The initial design using a Klann mechanism was unstable and faced interference issues, preventing effective testing. The creator redesigned the mechanism, achieving functionality but sacrificing elegance, leading to concerns about the quality of the accompanying report. Suggestions include documenting the unsuccessful model and explaining the redesign process to highlight learning outcomes. Emphasizing the value of learning from failures can enhance the report's depth and relevance.
jehan60188
Messages
201
Reaction score
1
so, I have to make a single-actuator walker for a class. it has to have two (unpowered) wheels, and two legs (it's a mechanism design class)

here's the motor i have to use: http://www.pololu.com/catalog/product/71

i've drafted out a klann mechanism, and even made an assembly in solidworks

http://imgur.com/8WbZb


but it's too rickety when I build it!
http://imgur.com/lDcE4

so rickety, that I can't test it.
but i know (from manually manipulating it) that the nuts, bolts, and legs will interfere with each other

so, two questions:

how can I stabilize, and how can I prevent interference?

thanks!
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well, I totally redesigned the mechanism.
It is inelegant, and boring, but it works.
The only problem is that this project includes a report, which I've done in great depth for the other mechanism. This current mechanism does not lend itself to a good report (one that can demonstrate my knowledge of the course material).
what should i do?
1) have a short report, or
2) add a section to my report discussing the failure of creating my previous mechanism, and a short section featuring the new mechanism?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jehan60188,
I believe you should write your report to include the un-successful model and explain how you redesigned the new model to fix what was wrong with the old one. Learning from your mistakes is much more valuable than getting it perfect first time.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
9K
Back
Top