Factorial in example problem, I'm confused

AI Thread Summary
The confusion arises from understanding the factorial notation, particularly how (n+1)! can be expressed as (n+1)n!. The explanation clarifies that (n+1)! expands to (n+1) multiplied by all integers down to 1, which is equivalent to (n+1) times n!. A concrete example using n=5 illustrates this, showing that both (n+1)! and (n+1)n! yield the same result. The discussion concludes with the participant expressing gratitude for the clarity provided by others, indicating they now understand the concept.
CinderBlockFist
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
I'm confused from one step to the next in the book.

In the first step, they have (n+1)!

then in the next step the write that as (n+1)n!


so (n+1)! = (n+1)n! ?

I don't understand that, can someone explain it to me ? ( I am very unfamiliar with factorials, this is like some of the first times I have seen it in computations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's take a general case:
a!=a(a-1)(a-2)(a-3)...
So in the problem:
(n+1)!=(n+1)(n+1-1)(n+1-2)(n+1-3)(n+1-4)...=(n+1)(n)(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)...
Now you can see that the terms after (n+1) are just n!, according to our general definition above, so:
(n+1)!=(n+1)n!
 
The easiest way to see it is a concrete example I think. Take n as 5... then (n+1)! is 6! , which is 6*5*4*3*2*1. (n+1)n! is the same thing because n+1 is 6, then n! is 5*4*3*2*1, giving you 6*5*4*3*2*1.

edit: posted late I guess :rolleyes:
 
n! = 1 *2 * 3 ... *n

(n + 1)! = 1 * 2 * 3 ... *n *(n+1)

Since 1*2*3...*n = n!, you can rewrite the statement so that

(n+1)! = (n+1)n!
 
Ohhh i get it now, thanks guys! all of your responses helped me visualize it, ty.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top