MHB Can I Factor 4a^2b^2 - 9(ab + c)^2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The expression 4a^2b^2 - 9(ab + c)^2 can be factored using the difference of squares method. The first step involves rewriting the expression as (2ab)^2 - (3(ab + c))^2. Clarification was provided that the number 9 is not part of the squaring of (ab + c), but rather can be expressed as (3(ab + c))^2. This approach allows for the application of the difference of squares formula to simplify the expression. The discussion concludes with the intention to complete the problem later.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Factor the expression.

4a^2b^2 - 9(ab + c)^2

Should I FOIL (ab + c)^2 as step 1?

I can then distribute 9 as step 2, right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would first write the expression as:

$$(2ab)^2-(3(ab+c))^2$$

Now, factor as the difference of squares, and simplify. :D
 
MarkFL said:
I would first write the expression as:

$$(2ab)^2-(3(ab+c))^2$$

Now, factor as the difference of squares, and simplify. :D

The number 9 is not part of the squaring for (ab + c)^2. So, where did 3 come from? Does 3 come from the fact that 3^2 is 9? This makes sense to me if 9 were inside the parentheses for (ab + c)^2 but it's not. See what I mean?
 
RTCNTC said:
The number 9 is not part of the squaring for (ab + c)^2. So, where did 3 come from? Does 3 come from the fact that 3^2 is 9? This makes sense to me if 9 were inside the parentheses for (ab + c)^2 but it's not. See what I mean?

I was just rewriting that term as a perfect square:

$$9(ab+c)^2=3^2(ab+c)^2=(3(ab+c))^2$$
 
MarkFL said:
I was just rewriting that term as a perfect square:

$$9(ab+c)^2=3^2(ab+c)^2=(3(ab+c))^2$$

Ok. I will complete this problem tomorrow.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top