MHB Factoring Polynomials: A Faster Way!

paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I just want to know the faster way to factor the expression. I already factored it out using trial and I am hoping you could give me some tricks to go about it faster than the usual method. Thanks

$192x^3-164x^2-270x$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We see that $2x$ is a factor of all 3 terms, so we may write:

$$2x(96x^2-82x-135)$$

Now, on the quadratic factor, I would use the quadratic formula to determine the roots:

$$x=-\frac{5}{6},\,\frac{27}{16}$$

And since $$96=6\cdot16$$, we can write:

$$2x(6x+5)(16x-27)$$
 
Factoring polynomials is a process fraught with peril, it might be that all our attempts end in failure.

If one assumes (because maybe your instructor has told you so) that a polynomial *does* indeed have a factorization, we can use a tool called "the rational root test", which tells us that any (non-zero) root (and there might not be any) in the rationals is of the form:

$\pm\dfrac{p}{q}$

where $p$ is an integer that divides 135, and $q$ is an integer that divides 96 (because of MarkFL's factoring out the $2x$).

This still leaves several possibilities to be checked out with "trial and error", but it at least cuts down on the sheer number of tries.

The long and short of this is:

with a polynomial of degree 3, "guess and check" for the rational roots is probably the fastest (the "formula" for cubics is pretty nasty),

with a polynomial of degree 2, the quadratic formula is usually your friend (unless you can "see" the factorization at once).

Factoring polynomials of degree 4 is often *very* difficult (unless there's no $x^3$ and $x$ terms), and factoring polynomials of degree 5 is often a lost cause.
 
Hello!

From what MarkFl provided, he used the quadratic formula to find the roots of $96x^2-82x-135$
Since the roots are x = -5/6 and x = 27/16 I am thinking that the factored form of $96x^2-82x-135$
Would be $(x+\frac{5}{6})(x-\frac{27}{16}) = (\frac{(6x+5)(16x-27)}{96})$
So the completely factored form of the entire expression could be

$(\frac{(6x+5)(16x-27)x}{48})$

I know it is wrong but can you tell me why?
 
You are correct when you state:

$$\left(x+\frac{5}{6}\right)\left(x-\frac{27}{16}\right)=\frac{(6x+5)(16x-27)}{96}$$

However, the LHS is equal to:

$$\frac{96x^2-82x-135}{96}$$

Therefore:

$$96x^2-82x-135=(6x+5)(16x-27)$$

You see for any roots of a quadratic (or any polynomial), there are an infinite number of polynomials having those roots. In the case of the quadratic, let's say it has the roots $r_1,\,r_2$. Then the family of quadratics having those two roots is given by:

$$f(x)=k(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$$ where $$0\ne k$$

Does that make sense?
 
MarkFL said:
You are correct when you state:

$$\left(x+\frac{5}{6}\right)\left(x-\frac{27}{16}\right)=\frac{(6x+5)(16x-27)}{96}$$

However, the LHS is equal to:

$$\frac{96x^2-82x-135}{96}$$

Therefore:

$$96x^2-82x-135=(6x+5)(16x-27)$$

You see for any roots of a quadratic (or any polynomial), there are an infinite number of polynomials having those roots. In the case of the quadratic, let's say it has the roots $r_1,\,r_2$. Then the family of quadratics having those two roots is given by:

$$f(x)=k(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$$ where $$0\ne k$$

Does that make sense?

Hello!
From what I understand when you know the roots of a certain polynomial we can use those roots to get the factored form a that polynomial.
Is the expression $$\left(x+\frac{5}{6}\right)\left(x-\frac{27}{16}\right)$$ equivalent to $96x^2-82x-135$? And if it is how do we transform it to $96x^2-82x-135$

Please bear with me.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top