Why do certain characteristics make a species more susceptible to extinction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swetasuria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Extinction Factors
AI Thread Summary
Certain characteristics, such as large body size, small population size, low reproductive rate, and high trophic level feeding, increase a species' susceptibility to extinction. Feeding at high trophic levels means relying on a fragile food chain, where the survival of carnivores depends on the availability of herbivores and plants. Larger species require more food, making them more vulnerable to environmental changes like droughts. In contrast, smaller species, such as arthropods, benefit from their size and adaptations, allowing them to survive in various conditions. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for conservation efforts.
Swetasuria
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
It was given in my school textbook that large body size, small population size, low reproductive rate, feeding at high trophic levels, fixed migratory roots and habitats and localised and narrow range of distribution are the characteristics susceptible to extinction.

I don't understand how feeding at high trophic levels and large body size could help in extinction of a species.

I have learned that arthropods can survive better because of its jointed appendages and protective covering. Does their small size help them too? Also, I didn't understand what they meant by saying 'feeding at trophic levels'.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you look up 'trophic level' to see its definition? 'Feeding at a high trophic level' means 'feeding high on the food chain'. A plant can survive on water, air, and sunlight and will survive as long as those are sufficient. An herbivore eats plants so has to have all those, so the plant will survive, and a relatively low level of other herbivores. A carnivore has to have herbivores surviving so need plants to survive but also needs a relatively low level of other carnivores. The higher on the 'trophic level' you are, the longer and more fragile your 'food chain' is.

Also, it should be clear that the larger you are, the more food you need and the more you will be affected by drought or other scarcity of food.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Did you look up 'trophic level' to see its definition? 'Feeding at a high trophic level' means 'feeding high on the food chain'. A plant can survive on water, air, and sunlight and will survive as long as those are sufficient. An herbivore eats plants so has to have all those, so the plant will survive, and a relatively low level of other herbivores. A carnivore has to have herbivores surviving so need plants to survive but also needs a relatively low level of other carnivores. The higher on the 'trophic level' you are, the longer and more fragile your 'food chain' is.

Also, it should be clear that the larger you are, the more food you need and the more you will be affected by drought or other scarcity of food.

Right, thanks! :smile:
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top