Fall into Space-Time's Minimum Point

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noctisdark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall Space-time
Noctisdark
Messages
224
Reaction score
35
Hi there, the most basic formula from Newtonian gravitation is, for a free falling object, x = gt^2/2, where x is the displacement in the vectical direction, in the case of general relativity, this just happens to be for weak gravitational fields, for the sake of simplicity (trying to express my thoughts) let's first talk about a weak one, gt^2/2 look like a parabola, so there is some extreme point which is the minimum, you cannot go further, if space time is a curved manifold too, then there must be some extreme points such the manifold is minimum (like the tip of U), one can say that if spacetime is like that, then we can fall onto it, until we reach that minimum point when we cannot fall anymore, is that point special, what does it represent, how is the time flow relative to other observers away from the curvature, how is space there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Noctisdark said:
, gt^2/2 look like a parabola,...if space time is a curved manifold too,
You are confusing the extrinsic curvature of a trajectory with the intrinsic curvature of space time.

Noctisdark said:
if spacetime is like that, then we can fall onto it, until we reach that minimum point when we cannot fall anymore, is that point special, what does it represent, how is the time flow relative to other observers away from the curvature, how is space there?
At the center of the Earth you have a locally minimal clock rate.
 
  • Like
Likes Noctisdark
That local minimum clock rate exist at the center of mass, so at that point of space, time is running so slow relative to some observers, away from the center time is running somewhat "right" to them, so can i conclude that spacetime is a measure of how time flows at a point of space relative to an observer in a flat time ?, for that observer can he say that t = t(x,y,z)?,
 
Inside a hollow sphere there are no experienced gravitational accelerations. I take it though that a clock at the center ticks more slowly than one at the edge?
 
1977ub said:
Inside a hollow sphere there are no experienced gravitational accelerations.

Correct--more precisely, spacetime is flat.

1977ub said:
I take it though that a clock at the center ticks more slowly than one at the edge?

No. Clocks everywhere inside the hollow sphere tick at the same rate. But they all tick more slowly than clocks outside the sphere (and clocks outside the sphere tick more slowly the closer they are to the sphere's surface).
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top