Falling capacitor connected to constant voltage

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of a falling capacitor connected to a constant voltage source, utilizing two methods: energy analysis and force method. The energy analysis derives the final velocity of the capacitor plate as v = √(ε₀AV²/(Md) + gd), while the force method yields the same expression, confirming the calculations. The importance of accounting for the change in chemical energy of the battery is emphasized, as neglecting this leads to incorrect predictions, such as imaginary values for final speed in zero gravity scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the work-energy theorem
  • Familiarity with electrostatic energy calculations
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy concepts
  • Basic principles of Newton's second law of motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of energy conservation in isolated systems
  • Learn about the relationship between electrical energy and mechanical work
  • Explore the effects of varying gravitational conditions on mechanical systems
  • Investigate different system definitions and their impact on energy equations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of capacitors and energy transfer in mechanical systems.

palaphys
Messages
266
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
An air filled parallel plate capacitor with plate separation $d$ and area $A$ is connected to a constant voltage source $V$. The plates are horizontal and the top plate is free to move vertically without rotation. The system is in vacuum and friction is absent. If the upper plate is released from a height $d$, what is its speed when the separation becomes $d/2$?
Relevant Equations
Kinematics+Capacitor equations
1762623572128.webp

I have tried to proceed with two methods, which agree with each other
i) Energy analysis
If we use work energy theorem,
##
\sum W = \Delta K
##

So,
##
W_{\text{bat}} + W_{\text{field}} + W_{\text{grav}} = K_f \quad \text{(at } x = d/2 \text{)}
##

Battery work:
##
W_{\text{bat}} = V \cdot (C_i V) = C_i V^2 = \frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{d}
##

Change in electrostatic energy:
##
\Delta U_{\text{elec}} = U_f - U_i
= \frac{1}{2} C_f V^2 - \frac{1}{2} C_i V^2
= \frac{1}{2}(2C_i)V^2 - \frac{1}{2} C_i V^2
##
##
\Delta U_{\text{elec}} = C_i V^2 - \frac{1}{2} C_i V^2
= \frac{1}{2} C_i V^2
##

Change in gravitational potential energy:
##
\Delta U_{\text{grav}} = U_{g,f} - U_{g,i}
= Mg\left(\frac{d}{2}\right) - Mgd
= -Mg\frac{d}{2}
##

Substituting in the work–energy theorem:
##
M v^2 = C_i V^2 + Mg d
##
##
v^2 = \frac{C_i V^2}{M} + g d
##

Final expression using ##(C_i = \frac{\varepsilon_0 A}{d}\)##
##
\boxed{v = \sqrt{\frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{M d} + g d}}
##

ii) force method:
##
\text{Let } x \text{ be the downward displacement (so } x=0\text{ at start, } x=d/2 \text{ at end).}
##

Net downward force:
##
F_{\text{net}} = mg + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{(d - x)^2}
##
then I applied 2nd law:
##
m\,v\frac{dv}{dx} = mg + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{(d - x)^2}
##

integrating from initial ##\((x=0,\,v=0)\)## to final ##\((x=d/2,\,v=v)\)##:
##
\int_{0}^{v} m v\,dv
=
\int_{0}^{d/2} \left( mg + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{(d - x)^2} \right) dx
##

LHS
##
\frac{1}{2} m v^2
##

RHS
##
mg\frac{d}{2}
\;+\;
\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 A V^2
\int_{0}^{d/2} \frac{dx}{(d - x)^2}
##

integration:
##
\int_{0}^{d/2} \frac{dx}{(d - x)^2}
=
\left[-\frac{1}{d-x}\right]_{0}^{d/2}
=
-\frac{1}{d - d/2} + \frac{1}{d}
=
\frac{1}{d}
##

Thus:
##
\frac{1}{2} m v^2
=
mg\frac{d}{2}
+
\frac{1}{2}\frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{d}
##

So
##
v^2 = \frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{m d} + g d
##
##
\boxed{v = \sqrt{\frac{\varepsilon_0 A V^2}{m d} + g d}}
##

I hope both my methods are right. however, in the solution presented right below the problem, work done by the battery is not accounted for at all. Who is wrong here and why?(see below)
1762624406215.webp
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your two methods look correct.

I did catch a spot where you have two compensating errors:

palaphys said:
1762627997603.webp

Check the signs in this calculation. However, your result of ##\frac 1 d## is correct.

To see that their answer can't be correct, suppose the experiment is done in zero gravity.
 
TSny said:
Your two methods look correct.

I did catch a spot where you have two compensating errors:
I'm not able to edit it right now, but thanks for pointing it out.
TSny said:
To see that their answer can't be correct, suppose the experiment is done in zero gravity.
how is that possible? even their solution has included the effect of gravity right
 
palaphys said:
how is that possible? even their solution has included the effect of gravity right
Yes, they correctly accounted for gravity. But, they did not account for the change in chemical energy ##U_{chem}## of the battery. Their solution predicts an imaginary value for the final speed of the plate for the case where ##g = 0.##

This is a good problem for demonstrating the importance of clearly defining your "system".

If we take the capacitor, the earth, and the battery as the system, then we have an isolated system. So, ##\Delta E_{sys} = 0##. Then $$\Delta U_{cap} + \Delta U_{grav} + \Delta U_{chem} + \Delta K = 0.$$
If we consider the capacitor and the earth as the system, then the battery acts as an external agent doing work on the system. Then, $$W_{bat} = \Delta U_{cap} + \Delta U_{grav} + \Delta K.$$
Other possibilities are:
(a) Choose the capacitor to be the system,
(b) Choose just the top plate of the capacitor to be the system.

What would the work-energy equation look like for these two choices?

If set up correctly, all of these different choices for the system will yield the same answer for the speed of the plate.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K