Fast way to decompose plastic bags.

  • Thread starter Thread starter matthyaouw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plastic
AI Thread Summary
Microorganisms can degrade plastic, and identifying the right microbes and optimal growth conditions could significantly accelerate this process. Research indicates that at 37 degrees Celsius and with the right bacterial concentration, microbes can consume up to 43 percent of a plastic sample in six weeks. However, practical considerations arise regarding the heating of the mixture and the byproducts of microbial metabolism. While bacteria do produce CO2, they also generate organic materials that can enrich soil, making this method potentially more beneficial than traditional combustion, which primarily yields CO2, water, and inorganic ash. The discussion raises questions about the environmental implications of rapidly decomposing fossil-carbon products, suggesting a need for careful evaluation of the benefits versus the risks of accelerated plastic degradation.
matthyaouw
Gold Member
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
5
Since plastic does eventually degrade, it must be eaten by microorganisms. If those microorganisms, as well as the optimal conditions for their growth, could be identified, we could put them to work eating the plastic much faster than under normal conditions.

...

At 37 degrees and optimal bacterial concentration, the microbes had consumed 43 percent of a plastic sample within six weeks.

http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/2RcIPs/blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/05/27/its-in-the-bag-teenager-wins-science-fair-solves-massive-environmental-problem/

Ok, interesting, but is this practical? Leaving aside the means by which you'd heat the mix to a cosy 37 degrees, what would be the products of this? The microbes will metabolise and throw out gasses I presume. What sort and in what volumes? Would doing this in the (relative) blink of an eye be in any way worse than just allowing them to decompose the normal (slow) way? How about any worse than just burning them? I'm intrigued to know the implications of this idea.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
While bacteria do exhale some CO2, they also form a wide variety of organic materials in the process of reproducing. So, the product of their consumption of plastic bags would be far better for the soil than simple combustion.

Combustion, would produce CO2, H20 and inorganic ash. Extremely common and not particularly valuable products.
 
Thanks for the input :)

So what do people think? Is it worth the effort?
 
Isn't our biggest environmental problem currently that we've been decomposing products that contain fossil-carbon much too quickly?

And so now you're advertising a way to decompose another product that contains fossil-carbon much more quickly?
 
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
These last days, there is a seemingly endless cluster of rather powerful earthquakes close to the islands of Santorini, Amorgos, Anafi, and Ios. Remember, this is a highly volcanically active region, Santorini especially being famous for the supervolcanic eruption which is conjectured to have led to the decline of the Minoan civilization: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minoan_eruption To grasp the scale of what is happening, between the 26th of January and the 9th of February, 12000...

Similar threads

Back
Top