Faulty electricity homework question?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework question related to the I-V characteristics of a diode and a resistor in a circuit. The original poster presents a scenario where a voltage is applied to a combination of these components, seeking to determine the current that flows through them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the diode and resistor being in parallel versus series, with some questioning the original poster's interpretation of the problem setup. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between voltage and current in the context of the I-V graphs provided.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions about the circuit configuration. There is a recognition of potential typos in the problem statement, and some participants are exploring the implications of these configurations on the current flow.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding whether the diode and resistor are in series or parallel, which affects the analysis. Participants are considering how to visualize the I-V characteristics to better understand the current distribution across the components.

z.js
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Hoping someone will be able to help me out with a electricity homework question that sounds a bit unreasonable to me.

Homework Statement



Question 8 (Read the section after Q4 first!)

The I-V characteristics of a diode and a resistor to be used in a simple circuit with a varaible voltage power supply are shown in the graphs.

I have a linear graph for the resistor for which I = 200mA at V = 1 V
I have a graph for the diode for which I = 0 mA at V = 0, I = 20 mA at V = 1, I about 1000mA at V = 2 ... At V = 1.8, the graph is near-vertical.

The question:
The diode and resistor are placed in parallel and a variable voltage applied to them.
a. If a voltage of 4.0 V is applied to the combination, what current will flow through them both?

Homework Equations



Ohm's law, V=IR. Applicable always to Ohmic devices, and applicable to non-Ohmic devices only for constant V or I (R is always changing).

The Attempt at a Solution



If I extrapolate the graph of the I-V characteristic for the diode to V=4, the gradient approaches infinity. Thus the resistance of the diode approaches zero. (R = 1/gradient). Since V = IR, the voltage drop across the diode also approaches zero.

Therefore the effective resistance of the diode-resistor series pair is equal to the resistance of the resistor, 5 ohm.

At 4.0V, I = V/R = 4V/5Ohm = 0.8A = 800mA.

However, the answer states 400mA.

I have attached a photo of the page with the graphs.
If my working is wrong, I would really like to know where I went wrong!
Thanks!
Stephen
 

Attachments

  • IMGP0001.jpg
    IMGP0001.jpg
    11.8 KB · Views: 453
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I extrapolate the graph of the I-V characteristic for the diode to V=4, the gradient approaches infinity. Thus the resistance of the diode approaches zero.
Correct so far.

(R = 1/gradient). Since V = IR, the voltage drop across the diode also approaches zero.
Not correct.

Therefore the effective resistance of the diode-resistor series pair is equal to the resistance of the resistor, 5 ohm.
Not correct.

The resister and diode are in parallel.
You described a situation where the diode is conducting - therefore it can be replaced by a short circuit.
 
Is the connection parallel or series?
 
From post #1: explicit problem statement:
The question:
The diode and resistor are placed in parallel and a variable voltage applied to them.
... mind you, could be a typo.
 
Simon Bridge said:
From post #1: explicit problem statement:

... mind you, could be a typo.

I think it is a typo. that's why I asked.
 
dauto said:
I think it is a typo. that's why I asked.
The question asks:
what current will flow through them both?
That implies it's in series. If in parallel, it should say through "the combination", or somesuch.
 
Sorry... it was a typo. The diode and resistor are in series, not parallel.
@Simon Bridge:
"(R = 1/gradient). Since V = IR, the voltage drop across the diode also approaches zero."
You said this was incorrect... could you elaborate on that?
"Therefore the effective resistance of the diode-resistor series pair is equal to the resistance of the resistor, 5 ohm."
Is this still wrong?
 
z.js said:
Sorry... it was a typo. The diode and resistor are in series, not parallel.
@Simon Bridge:
"(R = 1/gradient). Since V = IR, the voltage drop across the diode also approaches zero."
You said this was incorrect... could you elaborate on that?
"Therefore the effective resistance of the diode-resistor series pair is equal to the resistance of the resistor, 5 ohm."
Is this still wrong?

The total drop across the pair is 4V, but you do not know how that is distributed.
Can you think of a way of superimposing the two graphs to represent this?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Well, in series, the current is constant across the circuit. So if I can find V for which both graphs have the same I, I guess that would be it... something to chew on... looks like I = 400mA for which both V are approximately equal to 2V!

Thanks guys!
 
  • #10
z.js said:
Well, in series, the current is constant across the circuit. So if I can find V for which both graphs have the same I, I guess that would be it... something to chew on... looks like I = 400mA for which both V are approximately equal to 2V!

Thanks guys!
Yes, that looks about right. But I ask again, can you think of a way of superimposing the graphs that would allow you to read the answer straight off?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K