I How Does Bragg's Diffraction Apply to FCC Lattices?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Yair Galili
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fcc Structure
Yair Galili
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
20170514_110831-1.jpg
I tried to treat FCC lattice with a lattice constant a, as a monoatomic lattice.
The reciprocal lattice is a BCC with a lattice constant 2pi/a.
And the structure factor is 1.
But I can treat FCC lattice with a lattice constant a, as a simple cubic lattice,
with 4 atoms in each unit cell. As one can see in Wikipedia:
upload_2017-5-14_11-14-34.png

Now the distance between adjacent planes in the reciprocal lattice is
as in a simple cubic: a/sqrt(h^2+k^2+l^2),and I cannot see
how I can get the same wavelengths,according to Bragg's diffraction.
 

Attachments

  • 20170514_110831-1.jpg
    20170514_110831-1.jpg
    16.7 KB · Views: 673
Physics news on Phys.org
You d
Yair Galili said:
View attachment 203502 I tried to treat FCC lattice with a lattice constant a, as a monoatomic lattice.
The reciprocal lattice is a BCC with a lattice constant 2pi/a.
And the structure factor is 1.
But I can treat FCC lattice with a lattice constant a, as a simple cubic lattice,
with 4 atoms in each unit cell. As one can see in Wikipedia:
View attachment 203503
Now the distance between adjacent planes in the reciprocal lattice is
as in a simple cubic: a/sqrt(h^2+k^2+l^2),and I cannot see
how I can get the same wavelengths,according to Bragg's diffraction.
You did not calculate any specific values for the lattice spacings if you do you'll see they are the same. Try to calculate the first 5 peaks, for example.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top