What is the difference between the stress results and why is it important?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WillemBouwer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Fea Valve
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of a nozzle check valve body, comparing stress results from a personal analysis using PTC CREO 2 Mechanica to those from a professional engineer. The user constrained the valve at flange hole locations and applied pressure loads for both fully open and closed conditions, yielding maximum Von Mises stresses of 224 MPa and 221 MPa, respectively. In contrast, the professional's analysis indicated a maximum stress of 312.5 MPa, prompting questions about discrepancies. Key considerations include mesh size, boundary conditions, and load application, as well as the potential impact of how the valve is restrained at both ends. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate stress analysis in valve design.
WillemBouwer
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
I have to run a FEA analysis on a nozzle check valve body DN700... Its been to a professional engineer and he has completed the study so I am trying to do it myself to get to know the software better... I'm using PTC CREO 2 mechanica as the software...

Attached find a picture of the valve body.

I have constaint the valve at the hole locations on the flanges, as pin constaints. Where the angular constraint is free and the axial constraint is fixed.

The valve is rated at 40 bar, therefor should be tested at 1.5 time working pressure so 60 bar... So the load I used was a pressure load on the surfaces of the entire inside of the body for full open condition, and on the surfaces up to the point where the disc should close the flow off for the fully closed condition.

I would like to analize the valve in both fully open and fully closed conditions. With the disc of the valve pressing against the diffuser and the body when fully open, and pressing against the centre piece and the body at fully closed position...

I have set the material to be SG42 Cast iron and meshed the body...

At fully open condition I get the Maximum Von Mises stress to be 224 MPa at the bolted area
At fully closed condition I et the Maximum Von Mises stress to be 221 MPa on the fins of the body...

However a picture of the professional engineers findings have been attached. He finds the Max Von Mises stress to be 312.5 MPa which differs from my analysis.

Now the question is: Why is his stress more, what am I not thinking about? Can anyone help please, thanks... It is complex to explain what I did but ask eny questions, haha...
 

Attachments

  • 221MPa fully closed condition.jpg
    221MPa fully closed condition.jpg
    36.1 KB · Views: 492
  • 224MPa fully open condition.jpg
    224MPa fully open condition.jpg
    33.9 KB · Views: 512
  • Body1.jpg
    Body1.jpg
    40.5 KB · Views: 462
Engineering news on Phys.org
Since your value is lower, it's most likey just a case of your mesh size being too small at the areas of maximum stress. Try increasing the mesh size at the obvious areas.
 
It's impossible to guess what the difference is. The most likely two things to check are the lioads and the boundary conditions.

FWIW, in the left hand picture it looks likke the vanes supporting the central disk are bending axially. There is a stress gradient from one end to the other similar to a cantilever beam. In the right hand picture, they are doing something different.

Plotting the deformed shape of the model might show you if something crazy is happening.

I don't have any experience of this sort of pipework analysis, but it could make a lot of difference if you restrain only one flange rather than both flanges. Think about what each end the valve is attached to - for example a stiff pressure vessel or a relatively flexible pipe.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...

Similar threads

Back
Top